Mike Belt
Well-Known Member
I figure most hunters don't use or believe in calls. Of those that do it appears that most of them do not believe in blind calling with grunt tubes. That's fine and you need to go with whatever you have confidence in. Just for arguements sake though, of all those hunters I've seen respond negatively to blind calling for bucks with a grunt tube, how many use estrous doe calls (be they tubes or cans)and call blindly to bucks? I'm sure that most don't wait until they see a buck to break out the doe calls and rely on bucks hearing them calling from a distance and responding. Again, just for the sake of arguement, what's the difference in doe calling blindly to bucks and expecting a reaction and grunting to unseen bucks trying to pull them in? If a buck is out of sight and hears you calling he's just as likely to respond to a doe calling as a buck grunting if he's in the mood to respond. Sometimes his entrance might be different depending on which call he's responding to. In most cases I've witnessed, if the timing is right and a buck is in the mood to respond to doe calling he usually comes in with less apprehension than when responding to buck calling. When buck calling they may respond either by charging in or sneaking in. I guess that all depends on their status in the local pecking order and/or their testosterone level at the immediate time. It may also have something to do with where they're hunted and how often they've been duped by artifial calls as well. I don't advocate every Tom, Richard, and Harry going to the woods blasting away on calls because a little common sense and knowledge of how deer respond to calls is required and too much misuse could lesson the effectiveness of calls all together. In fact, I wish I was the only one that knew anything about it. I'm just curious as to why there's such a low percentage of hunters that have any faith in blind calling.