I don't know what it is, but it seems like deer that are taken
on old phosphate mining lands produce good bucks. I always
thought that the phosphate mineral had something to do with good
antler development. I posted about this one time, and several
hunters said that this mineral has nothing to do with antler
growth.
The only explaination that I have is that, if the land is
unclaimed, there is a tremendous amount of nutritious cover that
go hand in hand with each other.
Could the phosphate residue have anything to do with the plant
growth and the nutrients that the plant might contain?
I guess it would probably take a plant scientist to figure this
one out, but I have seen the results. I just don't know the
answer.
on old phosphate mining lands produce good bucks. I always
thought that the phosphate mineral had something to do with good
antler development. I posted about this one time, and several
hunters said that this mineral has nothing to do with antler
growth.
The only explaination that I have is that, if the land is
unclaimed, there is a tremendous amount of nutritious cover that
go hand in hand with each other.
Could the phosphate residue have anything to do with the plant
growth and the nutrients that the plant might contain?
I guess it would probably take a plant scientist to figure this
one out, but I have seen the results. I just don't know the
answer.