That was a BS call. The receiver took 3 steps after the catch and Moseley led with his shoulder right in the chest. IMO that was textbook.rooketnhunter":1oa20trk said:
Official UT vs KY Thread
- Thread starter gator-n-buck
- Start date
rooketnhunter
Well-Known Member
Can they overturn the call after the game?
THEdonkey0515
Well-Known Member
Horrible targeting call. The ky receiver turned his head up field took 3 steps,and took a hard hit to the upper chest?
No way he should have been thrown outta the game.
No way he should have been thrown outta the game.
gator-n-buck
Well-Known Member
rooketnhunter":20epcz8r said:
Nope....
gator-n-buck
Well-Known Member
52-21...... UT fans were hiding the first part of this post..... :rotf:
Some of us were watching the game.gator-n-buck":2zjpcc3a said:
gator-n-buck
Well-Known Member
PalsPal":1uset8d4 said:
Let us know when that ever happens "Alex"...... :tu:
They missd that one badly.
Wrangler95
Well-Known Member
Terrible call,Musburger and Jessie Palmer agreed.Should have been a fumble recovery Tennessee!!
I have never seen a targeting call upheld when the only contact on a player was shoulder to chest and the reciever had taken three steps after the catch. I also have never seen a ball that was caught and three steps taken and then dropped not considered a fumble. But to review the call and still get it wrong is inexcusable.
gator-n-buck
Well-Known Member
Wrangler95":3h5yhhbv said:
Just when I thought that you were warming up to ole Jessie...... :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
gator-n-buck
Well-Known Member
The targeting call is the correct call. I watched the video five times. The UT' s player crown of the the helmet hits the KY player in the face mask before the shoulder lands. It's bang-bang but correct call....
http://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-fo ... s-big-hit/
http://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-fo ... s-big-hit/
I don't know if you are blinded to anything involving Tennessee or just stirring the pot. I'll go with B. Nobody could actually believe some of the stuff you post.gator-n-buck":1djx1a3v said:The targeting call is the correct call. I watched the video five times. The UT' s player crown of the the helmet hits the KY player in the face mask before the shoulder lands. It's bang-bang but correct call....
http://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-fo ... s-big-hit/
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
TeamMainStreet
Well-Known Member
gator-n-buck":1opnzc0p said:The targeting call is the correct call. I watched the video five times. The UT' s player crown of the the helmet hits the KY player in the face mask before the shoulder lands. It's bang-bang but correct call....
http://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-fo ... s-big-hit/
No, it wasn't the correct call. The receiver caught and possessed the ball and took three steps with his head turned and looking up field making him a ball carrier at that point. He was not defenseless. The TN DB did not strike with the crown of the helmet. Unless the definition of crown of the helmet has been changed to mean the back of the helmet. The back of his helmet brushed the face mask of the UK player as he actually turned his head to avoid leading with the crown.
UK receiver straight up got his plows cleaned and fumbled the ball. It was a horrible call and should be reviewed by the SEC and suspension lifted.
gator-n-buck
Well-Known Member
PalsPal":1v66jjmk said:TeamMainStreet":1v66jjmk said:
How dare you? Don't you know that GnB played some college ball back in the day? Stop inserting facts into his dream world!
I guess y'all better call the refs and tell them that they got it wrong even after watching the replay..... Lol
I wouldn't hold my breath on the SEC stepping in but I guess anything is possible.... :tu:
I doubt they will lift the 1/2 game suspension, but it was the wrong call and they had a chance to get it right with the video footage and failed. The first half of the South Carolina game suspension should be lifted.
I agreeTreyB":3g6j2fe5 said:
TeamMainStreet
Well-Known Member
TreyB":ohlpkry8 said:
Oh I don't really think they will change anything. That would mean that they were wrong on the initial call. It was the wrong call though.
That Miami, Duke ending was the sorriest excuse for reffing a game that I personally have ever seen. Those morons should never call another game. Duke got royally screwed out of that game.
Hmm, the procedures in the targeting call allow them to reduce (but they probably won't since they know they would look foolish and it really shouldn't hurt UT that bad since we are only playing SC); whereas there is no "out" in the Duke/Miami fiasco.
I heard a good point earlier; had it been Duke that scored on that play to win the game, would the outrage have been so loud? I don't think so, because everyone hates Miami.
I heard a good point earlier; had it been Duke that scored on that play to win the game, would the outrage have been so loud? I don't think so, because everyone hates Miami.
TeamMainStreet":12bav0v9 said:
The refs were bad enough but what gets to me is the watched the replay to see if he had his knee down and they said no... If any call should get turned it should be that because if they overturned that call Duke is still undefeated in conference play!
baddnole
Well-Known Member
Hillbilly Hunter":3376fza8 said:
Under review right now . Probably will be lifted.
Brisco Darlin
Well-Known Member
so have the vols wrapped up the SEC east yet?
Brisco Darlin":kw46heck said:
?
Are you serious? Florida has it all but wrapped up. They could still blow it, but their D is too good to allow that.
It could be ugly though if FSU beats them and then they get smoked by Bama in the SEC champ. game.
TeamMainStreet
Well-Known Member
PalsPal":18vpnr6d said:
No he wasn't being serious. It was a jab at TN.
