UTGrad
Well-Known Member
This old guy was locked down with a yearling doe that was in heat this morning. I took him out of the gene pool. He had a big head and body. #2 down.
I disagree as the regs clearly state anything less than is considered antlerless. He did his genetic pool a big favorSelphLogging said:That particular deer would be considered an antler less deer, but I feel if a hunter knows it is a buck before shooting, he should therefore feel obligated to check in as an antlered deer.
Jonboy said:I mean at 100 yards how would you know it wasn't a spike with short tines?
SelphLogging said:That particular deer would be considered an antler less deer, but I feel if a hunter knows it is a buck before shooting, he should therefore feel obligated to check in as an antlered deer.
I agree that legally it is an antlerless deer and should be checked out as such . But thinking you are doing something positive for the genetics in a free range deer herd by killing him is incorrect .TITANSFAN2104 said:I disagree as the regs clearly state anything less than is considered antlerless. He did his genetic pool a big favorSelphLogging said:That particular deer would be considered an antler less deer, but I feel if a hunter knows it is a buck before shooting, he should therefore feel obligated to check in as an antlered deer.
UTGrad said:I've never seen a well managed property that didn't take a few cull bucks. I'd like to hear your explanation on why culling is an "incorrect" practice.
Woodson223 said:It's his deer he can shoot what he wont's to.Congrats
WhitesCreek said:Since when did members of TNDEER start criticizing people over their kills?