Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
More CWD Positives
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fairchaser" data-source="post: 4711815" data-attributes="member: 10373"><p>The conventional wisdom is that we have had it now for 3-5 years. The sampling done before failed to catch it but sampling was ramped up after Marshall County, MS discovered it. They said that the sampling they did this year would have discovered it at a 1% prevalence rate. Since we are 10 times that, they were bound to find it. I'm not aware of how extensive the sampling is in MS, so they could have it at a higher rate than it appears.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fairchaser, post: 4711815, member: 10373"] The conventional wisdom is that we have had it now for 3-5 years. The sampling done before failed to catch it but sampling was ramped up after Marshall County, MS discovered it. They said that the sampling they did this year would have discovered it at a 1% prevalence rate. Since we are 10 times that, they were bound to find it. I’m not aware of how extensive the sampling is in MS, so they could have it at a higher rate than it appears. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
More CWD Positives
Top