Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
More CWD Positives
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="poorhunter" data-source="post: 4711795" data-attributes="member: 16537"><p>From the number of positives in TN, I'm going to assume that conventional wisdom is CWD went from TN to MS? Even though it was found in MS first? Why are there exploding numbers in those two counties, and how does that compare to other hot zones across the country when they were first discovered? Zero to 30+ in the blink of an eye? That's way too fast for comfort.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="poorhunter, post: 4711795, member: 16537"] From the number of positives in TN, I’m going to assume that conventional wisdom is CWD went from TN to MS? Even though it was found in MS first? Why are there exploding numbers in those two counties, and how does that compare to other hot zones across the country when they were first discovered? Zero to 30+ in the blink of an eye? That’s way too fast for comfort. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
More CWD Positives
Top