Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
More CWD Positives
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="megalomaniac" data-source="post: 4711241" data-attributes="member: 2805"><p>Hmmm....</p><p></p><p>In the link provided, there are no positives prior to Nov 10th.... despite a bazillion negative results.</p><p></p><p>Maybe just because very few deer in the hot zone were killed and tested prior to that date due to a later rut in that locale, but if there are a disproportionate number of negatives from the hot zone, I'd have to strongly suspect sampling error.</p><p></p><p>Sent from my SCH-R970X using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="megalomaniac, post: 4711241, member: 2805"] Hmmm.... In the link provided, there are no positives prior to Nov 10th.... despite a bazillion negative results. Maybe just because very few deer in the hot zone were killed and tested prior to that date due to a later rut in that locale, but if there are a disproportionate number of negatives from the hot zone, I'd have to strongly suspect sampling error. Sent from my SCH-R970X using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
More CWD Positives
Top