Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
More CWD Positives
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="darn2ten" data-source="post: 4708582" data-attributes="member: 11044"><p>Man, this is crazy high for initial detection. If you break it down even further it gets worse. Take Mcnairy out of the equation since no positives had been found and you have a 10.7% prevalence rate.</p><p></p><p>Hardeman alone - 8.2%</p><p></p><p>Fayette alone - 19.4%</p><p></p><p>Disturbing numbers for sure. After looking over other states I'm not aware of initial detection prevalence rates even close to those numbers unless I missed some somewhere, which is possible. After looking at other data for other cwd hot zones and how their yearly percentages grew, it may be safe to say it's been there for somewhere between 3-5 years. I know there are variables, but I would think that would be pretty close.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="darn2ten, post: 4708582, member: 11044"] Man, this is crazy high for initial detection. If you break it down even further it gets worse. Take Mcnairy out of the equation since no positives had been found and you have a 10.7% prevalence rate. Hardeman alone - 8.2% Fayette alone - 19.4% Disturbing numbers for sure. After looking over other states I’m not aware of initial detection prevalence rates even close to those numbers unless I missed some somewhere, which is possible. After looking at other data for other cwd hot zones and how their yearly percentages grew, it may be safe to say it’s been there for somewhere between 3-5 years. I know there are variables, but I would think that would be pretty close. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
More CWD Positives
Top