ML scope dilemna.....

Tennessee Deer Sporting & Deer Hunting Community Forum

Help Support TNDeer | Tennessee Deer:

pass-thru

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2004
Messages
4,579
City & State/Province
va
Six years ago I bought a TC omega and mounted a 3-9x40 Monarch UCC on top. Accurate out to over 200 yards and I took a lot of deer with it.

However, I had to estimate holdover with the plex reticle....which, gave me reluctance to take longer shots.

I came across on a great deal on the recently discontinued swarovski AV 3-10x42 ml reticle. The reticle is more open than the plex, and has hash's that are perfectly aligned to the load. So zero at 100, and I have hash's out to 300. Also better quality glass allows for more effective shooting time within legal hours.

The problem: the vast majority of my shots are under 125 yards, so it is rare that I use the hash marks. And the more open reticle is a bit slower coming on target and less accurate at about 100 yards. This year I shot a couple of deer, on different occasions, at the end of my effective shooting light and the shots were less than perfect (both deer easily recovered, just not the peferect shot).

I am struggling with which scope to use. If I could have the better glass in the plex I would take that in a heartbeat. And the hash marks pay someday pay off on a distance shot on the buck of a lifetime. But I like the plex for quick shots. Which is the better choice?
 
Swaro's are junk, just send it to me for proper disposal. :grin:

Seriously, I see what your saying and I would just put the better peice of glass on (Swaro). I think you have more advantages this way.
 
the reticle on the Leupold with the B&C reticle is plenty heavy enough to pick up in low light..

I never looked through a Swarvo with that reticle,,
 

Latest posts

Back
Top