Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Quality Deer Management
Managing Expectations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BSK" data-source="post: 768119" data-attributes="member: 17"><p>plotman,</p><p></p><p>You'll get no argument from me that buck limits may have to be more restrictive in high hunter density areas to be effective. The question simply comes down to whether even more restrictive buck limits in Unit B would be measurably effective without puting undo limitations on hunters.</p><p></p><p>Honestly, if <em>hunters</em> in Unit B want more restrictive buck limits and the TWRA believes those more restrictive limits would be biologically effective, I have no problem with implementing them.</p><p></p><p>What I'm arguing against is more restrictive buck limits statewide. I don't think that is called for or would be that effective in some areas, especially Unit L.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BSK, post: 768119, member: 17"] plotman, You'll get no argument from me that buck limits may have to be more restrictive in high hunter density areas to be effective. The question simply comes down to whether even more restrictive buck limits in Unit B would be measurably effective without puting undo limitations on hunters. Honestly, if [i]hunters[/i] in Unit B want more restrictive buck limits and the TWRA believes those more restrictive limits would be biologically effective, I have no problem with implementing them. What I'm arguing against is more restrictive buck limits statewide. I don't think that is called for or would be that effective in some areas, especially Unit L. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Quality Deer Management
Managing Expectations
Top