Lots of talk on here over the years of being realistic in your goals…especially property to property. Below is IMO a prime example of such. This buck I am calling top end 2.5 possibly 3.5 but won't know till you see the teeth. What I do know is from a rack development standpoint, if 3.5, he is weak. He is one of if not the best rack I have seen on this property in the 20 years I've had access. If I, or any of my guests, saw this buck while hunting I would expect it to be killed. Based on what I know of the property and adjoining properties, this is the best I would expect and be happy with it. Know your limitations and make yourself happy.
I call 2.5 based on these factors: body definitely not a yearling, large chest/narrow hip, straight line belly, longer leg appearance, no Roman nose on a longer face, neck not rut swollen as I would expect for this time of year in this area…is he rut stressed already? Doubt it, but in the deer world never really know…
I call 2.5 based on these factors: body definitely not a yearling, large chest/narrow hip, straight line belly, longer leg appearance, no Roman nose on a longer face, neck not rut swollen as I would expect for this time of year in this area…is he rut stressed already? Doubt it, but in the deer world never really know…