Unless you're mainly wanting to use this cam for large food plots or fields,
I'd prefer the Browning Dark Ops for these reasons:
1) Comparable reliability, lower costs.
2) Smaller in size, and uses only 6AA batteries
3) I have found the cams (such as the Browning line) which have a small door to open near their bottom
to be more weatherproof over time (as compared to those cams where half the cam opens up as a door (like the Bushnells).
In time, cams which have a door opening across their top (most do) will typically eventually leak or pick up moisture,
as the rubber seal deteriorates. Cams which have no "break" on top are much less susceptible to moisture.
That said, Bushnell has one feature I prefer for using over large food plots & fields,
and that is their 2x field scan that can be very custom programmed.
Also, the Bushnell has a greater flash range.
Over mineral licks, scrapes, and trails, I prefer the Browning Dark Ops,
in part because it's less noticeable, in part because it can be programmed to take more pics per triggering event.
I often set the Brownings to take 4 or 5 pics, and you can set them to take those about a second apart (or faster if you prefer).
By contrast, the maximum number of pics (per trigger event) the Bushnell will take is 3,
and there is no customization feature as to how much time between those pics (will take all 3 in less than 2 seconds).
Think about this:
You have a buck chasing a doe, and she runs down the trail.
The Bushnell cam triggers, snapping 3 pics in under 2 seconds.
The buck is 2 seconds behind that doe.
But if you had the Browning cam set for 4 "slow" pics (4 pics one second apart),
you would be more likely to get the trailing buck.
Or you could set the Browning to take 7 "slow" pics (7 pics over 7 seconds) --- a setting I like on trails.
For the money, imo, both the above mentioned are good options.
How would you mainly use a new trail cam?