Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Off Topic TN Forums
Sports talk
Huh? Say it ain’t so
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="uncle_loue" data-source="post: 5853231" data-attributes="member: 7092"><p>im not sure who these schools are with wayyyy wayyyyy deeper pockets. i did a simple google search for ranking collectives and took a look at the first 3 articles from: ON3, oregon footbaall and sports illustrated. All three had UT's spyre collective in the top 3. </p><p></p><p>bama meanwhile was out of the top 10 in the ON3 and Oregon articles. they were #3 (yet mysteriously still behind those poor hillbillies from knoxville) in the SI article. </p><p></p><p>from the ducks writer:</p><p>"The best NIL collective on this list is indisputably the Spyre Sports Group of Tennessee. On3's article highlighted Spyre's role in one of the biggest stories in the history of NIL: Nico Iamaleava's contract with Spyre that had a total value of 8 million dollars. Spyre has it all: a wide base of boosters, a large balance of cash, and a mission designed to allow athletes to pursue their passions and maximize their profits. What might've set Spyre apart from A&M's 12th Man and Fund is the presence of a creativity that some said was lacking in "the Fund's," processes. One example of this is Spyre's process of having member brands, such as a fast-casual burger restaurant, that can be seamlessly paired with member athletes (perhaps an athlete with an interest in culinary arts), in a way that best suits both parties."</p><p></p><p>but you're probably right they more than likely just a bunch of country bumpkins with little to no money compared to real schools.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="uncle_loue, post: 5853231, member: 7092"] im not sure who these schools are with wayyyy wayyyyy deeper pockets. i did a simple google search for ranking collectives and took a look at the first 3 articles from: ON3, oregon footbaall and sports illustrated. All three had UT's spyre collective in the top 3. bama meanwhile was out of the top 10 in the ON3 and Oregon articles. they were #3 (yet mysteriously still behind those poor hillbillies from knoxville) in the SI article. from the ducks writer: "The best NIL collective on this list is indisputably the Spyre Sports Group of Tennessee. On3's article highlighted Spyre's role in one of the biggest stories in the history of NIL: Nico Iamaleava's contract with Spyre that had a total value of 8 million dollars. Spyre has it all: a wide base of boosters, a large balance of cash, and a mission designed to allow athletes to pursue their passions and maximize their profits. What might've set Spyre apart from A&M's 12th Man and Fund is the presence of a creativity that some said was lacking in "the Fund's," processes. One example of this is Spyre's process of having member brands, such as a fast-casual burger restaurant, that can be seamlessly paired with member athletes (perhaps an athlete with an interest in culinary arts), in a way that best suits both parties." but you're probably right they more than likely just a bunch of country bumpkins with little to no money compared to real schools. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Off Topic TN Forums
Sports talk
Huh? Say it ain’t so
Top