Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Off Topic TN Forums
Sports talk
Huh? Say it ain’t so
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="deerfanatic" data-source="post: 5836480" data-attributes="member: 1801"><p>Let me just save you the trouble since you seem incapable of comprehending what I laid out and explained which was correct btw but the plane was owned by a booster. Nico used it through the vol club who owned his rights and he had signed a deal and who at the time hadn't been deemed a booster and wasn't officially of affiliated with the university so guess what that means in court. No rules broken. Not at that time. Since they've been declared a booster and it would be a benefit that's illegal. This is the equivalent of the state having the speed limit at 70 and changing it a week later to 55 and wanting to give you a speeding ticket for driving 70 2 months ago. Also there's the whole Sherman act the NCAA is violating. That law states a group of individuals or entities cannot collude to keep individuals for maximizing their potential earnings. The NCAA saying collectives can't talk money with athletes and let them know their fair market value is keeping them from earning all they can. They are dead ducks and that's why they wrote that release yesterday saying further legal process will impeded their rule enforcing ability. Surely you see how this is gonna play out. And yes the bama collective has given numbers out to athletes before they signed with the university or they wouldn't sign with them which is against the rules. Every collective does it. It's asinine and not realistic to think that's not what is going on everywhere</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="deerfanatic, post: 5836480, member: 1801"] Let me just save you the trouble since you seem incapable of comprehending what I laid out and explained which was correct btw but the plane was owned by a booster. Nico used it through the vol club who owned his rights and he had signed a deal and who at the time hadn't been deemed a booster and wasn't officially of affiliated with the university so guess what that means in court. No rules broken. Not at that time. Since they've been declared a booster and it would be a benefit that's illegal. This is the equivalent of the state having the speed limit at 70 and changing it a week later to 55 and wanting to give you a speeding ticket for driving 70 2 months ago. Also there's the whole Sherman act the NCAA is violating. That law states a group of individuals or entities cannot collude to keep individuals for maximizing their potential earnings. The NCAA saying collectives can't talk money with athletes and let them know their fair market value is keeping them from earning all they can. They are dead ducks and that's why they wrote that release yesterday saying further legal process will impeded their rule enforcing ability. Surely you see how this is gonna play out. And yes the bama collective has given numbers out to athletes before they signed with the university or they wouldn't sign with them which is against the rules. Every collective does it. It's asinine and not realistic to think that's not what is going on everywhere [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Off Topic TN Forums
Sports talk
Huh? Say it ain’t so
Top