BSK
Well-Known Member
Has any tried the Hornady Bore Driver bullets? Either the FTX or ELD-X? Anyone shot both? Curious on personal experiences with them.
I've shot the ftx 300 grn in comparing to the xtp in 300 grn as far as checking the zero of my mz and they were they same zero. But I have not shot a deer with them yet to see the penetration or expansion of a recovered bullet.
I'd like to shoot them in a block of ballistic gel to see the penetration and expansion. There may be a YouTube video on that.
Wow, the guy at I Love Muzzleloading shot them in comparison to a bunch of other popular bullets, and the FTX was the most accurate bullet he tested (at 100 yard). However, he was using a hotter charge (80 grns BH209 by weight).The bore driver FTX is not very impressive with either powder charge tested here:
https://www.modernmuzzleloader.com/threads/hornady-50-caliber-bore-driver-ftx.39356/
The eldx is ok, not great:
https://www.modernmuzzleloader.com/threads/350-4g-bore-driver-eld-x.58070/
Wow, the guy at I Love Muzzleloading shot them in comparison to a bunch of other popular bullets, and the FTX was the most accurate bullet he tested (at 100 yard). However, he was using a hotter charge (80 grns BH209 by weight).
Accuracy is great and all, and I don't know of many people that ever had an issue with powerbelts and accuracy, but not expanding like shown is the main problem. It would be like using a field tip on an arrow. I would guess the construction of the ftx is similar to the sst/shockwave. IMO it's too hard of a bullet. Does fine at smokeless speeds, but not at standard muzzleloader speeds. That's why pistol bullets are so popular. They're not as aerodynamic, but they work very efficiently.Wow, the guy at I Love Muzzleloading shot them in comparison to a bunch of other popular bullets, and the FTX was the most accurate bullet he tested (at 100 yard). However, he was using a hotter charge (80 grns BH209 by weight).
Hoping to test them this weekend. I'll let you know.Has any tried the Hornady Bore Driver bullets? Either the FTX or ELD-X? Anyone shot both? Curious on personal experiences with them.
Those are nasty on deer. I shoot the 300 grainers and total devastation is an understatementOr use a fury star tipView attachment 250581
I've been pleased with them so far. This was a 250grThose are nasty on deer. I shoot the 300 grainers and total devastation is an understatement
Not expanding? The problem with Powerbelts is they go to pieces (in the lighter models). What I want is a MZ bullet that WON'T expand too much. What I DON'T want is a 45 caliber pistol bullet in a sabot.Accuracy is great and all, and I don't know of many people that ever had an issue with powerbelts and accuracy, but not expanding like shown is the main problem. It would be like using a field tip on an arrow. I would guess the construction of the ftx is similar to the sst/shockwave. IMO it's too hard of a bullet. Does fine at smokeless speeds, but not at standard muzzleloader speeds. That's why pistol bullets are so popular. They're not as aerodynamic, but they work very efficiently.
I will NEVER EVER use sabots! You have a 50-caliber gun. Why shoot a 45-caliber bullet?We have no restrictions here on muzz. No reason to use bore size projectiles. Use sabots. Use BARNES. Yes they are a dollar a shot, so three of them is a gallon of gas. Good luck next Saturday everyone !
And they don't really mean muchTwo words. Sectional Density
Just shoot round balls.Not expanding? The problem with Powerbelts is they go to pieces (in the lighter models). What I want is a MZ bullet that WON'T expand too much. What I DON'T want is a 45 caliber pistol bullet in a sabot.
I killed quite a few with patched round balls back in the early 90s.Just shoot round balls.
I will NEVER EVER use sabots! You have a 50-caliber gun. Why shoot a 45-caliber bullet?
Right....Just shoot round balls.
I saw a lot of deer lost to round balls. Terrible penetration and even worse accuracy. Plus, you need a slow-twist barrel.I killed quite a few with patched round balls back in the early 90s.
I absolutely will not shoot a light 45-caliber pistol bullet out of a 50-caliber rifle.The difference is the thickness of a human fingernail, do you seriously believe you can see a difference in performance?
I've used .44's, .45's and full bore 50's, you can't see a difference.
I absolutely will not shoot a light 45-caliber pistol bullet out of a 50-caliber rifle.
You're been given multiple options that just plain work but you're too stuck on a full bore option. There's entirely too much difference between manufacturers on muzzleloader barrels. TC used to run bigger than a cva. There isn't really a standard unlike rifle barrels, or even custom barrels. There's a reason sabots are popular. You can get them to fit a tight barrel or even a loose barrel. Pistol bullets work because they were designed to work closer to that velocity range. I have no idea why powerbelts are junk, but it pretty common to see them shoot very well but they don't perform well on an animal. Most everyone raves on Barnes, and I just wasn't impressed with them.Right....
The worst aerodynamics on the planet.
Light ? Who said light. I shoot Barnes TMZ 290 grain or the 300 grain Barnes expander if shooting under 100. Get some .458 sabots and a box of 400 grain Barnes originals if you want really heavy. The 240 grain .44 pistol bullet thing died 20 years ago ( my opinion )I absolutely will not shoot a light 45-caliber pistol bullet out of a 50-caliber rifle.
Light ? Who said light. I shoot Barnes TMZ 290 grain or the 300 grain Barnes expander if shooting under 100. Get some .458 sabots and a box of 400 grain Barnes originals if you want really heavy. The 240 grain .44 pistol bullet thing died 20 years ago ( my opinion )