? for "mature" buck hunters

Tennessee Deer Sporting & Deer Hunting Community Forum

Help Support TNDeer | Tennessee Deer:

RKenney

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
3,731
City & State/Province
Maury Co.
As many of the book bucks were only aged at 3.5, would you pull
the trigger on a monster racked buck, or would you spend time
calculating the bucks age.....before you pulled the trigger?

I know many of you can tell the age almost at first glance, but
can you in very thick and confined areas? I know I can't,
because I just don't have time to. Even if I did have time, I
am pulling the trigger on a monster racked buck, no matter how
old he is.
 
I personally don't care about the age of a buck, if Im hunting in Fayette Co. spot, I'll shoot anything. In IL, I'll look for a 130 plus
 
For the last many years, I've tried to define a shooter buck (for myself) by age, not antlers. Not saying antlers aren't a factor, but my focus is more on age. If you can get a good enough side view of a buck to determine much about his antlers, then you should have enough of a view to determine whether he's probably 4 1/2 or older, or probably 3 1/2 or younger. This is part art, part science, and part luck (the luck being mostly regarding how well and how long you get to look before making your decision). But most of the time, I can tell you more about his age than his antlers, whether it's just a quick view or a long one.

If I believe he's only 3 1/2 or younger, then my decision is to let him walk. However, can't say I could do that if his antlers appeared to score near B & C. Can say in the same season I've passed up 130-class 3 1/2's, I've killed 110-class 4 1/2's. Can also say I've let several 4 1/2 and older bucks walk simply because I didn't want to kill them, and yes, those decisions are usually based on antlers, too, like in my not wanting to use my final buck tag on a 4 1/2-yr-old buck with small antlers. Seems to be no way to totally get away from this antler high-grading issue.

RKenney said:
As many of the book bucks were only aged at 3.5, would you pull
the trigger on a monster racked buck, or would you spend time
calculating the bucks age.....before you pulled the trigger?
Going to depend on how you define "monster".
But as previously stated, I can usually tell as much or more about his age as his antlers.

I have passed up many 115-125-class 3 1/2's, and a few that appeared to gross over 130. If I have a good opportunity at a 3 1/2 that scores a lot higher than that, my decision will be based on the totality of the circumstance. If I think that particular buck has a good chance of surviving another year, I'd be more inclined to let him walk.

Normally, I raise my standards post-rut (regardless of whether I've killed a buck yet), since most bucks still alive post rut will live another year. On the other hand, my standards are lowest pre-rut (not because it's archery, but more because so many of those are going to get whacked in November anyway). My general rule of thumb is 4 1/2 or older, probably going to take him; 3 1/2 or younger, probabably going to let him walk.

Generally speaking IMO, the guy who passes one up this year is also the guy with the highest odds of seeing that particular buck again next year. Just like the best way to see more 3 1/2's started with passing up more 2 1/2's, the best way to see more 4 1/2 and older bucks begins when you routinely pass up 3 1/2's.

And, honestly, sometimes I'm happier in looking more forward to seeing what a particular 3 1/2 will look like at 4 1/2 than I would be if I killed him at 3 1/2. My freezer stays full of venison (mostly tender doe meat), so it's typically no big deal for me to let a particular buck walk knowing chances are high he'll survive. Besides, I'm often a bit lazy in respect I'd rather keep hunting than have to deal with a harvested deer.
 
Good post Wes. I admire you for your patients and your good deer
hunting expertize. By the way, there are no Buts to your reply.
 
RKenney,

I'm not exclusively a mature buck hunter. I'll shoot the first buck I see that I think is 3 1/2+, regardless of antlers.

As for field-judging age versus antler size, I know this sounds hard to believe, but I often never look directly at a buck's antlers. As soon as I know a deer is a buck, I look at his neck. I can usually get a good idea of his age from just a glance at his neck from any angle.

As an indication of how little I look at antlers, I shot one of my biggest bucks (HUGE antlers for my area) at nearly point-blank range (20 yards) in full daylight. After I had shot him and watched him run away and crash down about 70 yards away, I had no earthly idea how big his antlers were. I told my hunting buddies on the radio "maybe he's a 130-class 8-point." Yet he was a mid 150-class 13-point. I "looked that buck over" for no more than a half-second before I decided he was a shooter. He came up behind me, I slowly turned around to look over my shoulder and instead of big antlers, all I saw was a huge chest and neck walking towards me. I then turned back around and reached for my MZ. In that very brief glance at the buck I only got the roughest impression of "decent" antlers over his head.

I realize most hunters look for the rack first. I used to too. But after years of field-judging the age of bucks in trail-camera pictures, I've learned to look at a buck's neck first.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
BSK,
That is a great skill that you have, even in thick and confined
areas. I admire that skill. Maybe I will get better at it one
day. I saw your siminar in Franklin 2 years ago and I learned
alot.

I guess when I see a very large rack....I can't help it. I still
sort of feel guilty about the 160" buck I killed in 08 that was
aged between 2.5 and 3.5, but I still try to justify it.
 
Here in Tn all bucks under 3.5 are pretty safe walking by me as well as most 3.5's. I check out their headgear in part because I'm crazy about seeing antlers and in part because we have a minimum restriction where I hunt. I also try to check out body confirmation because our restrictions also read..."or 4.5 years old or better". Thus far everything that's come by me has been safe including quite a few that size-wise were larger than our minimum and also exceeded the age minimum. In retrospect there were a couple I should have dropped already. In my interpretation of "monstor", I would drop him no matter what age. Big antlers are big antlers....However I'm looking for both age and antlers which is why I still haven't taken the one I'm looking for.
 
I'll shoot one that's mature but doesn't have a big rack,and I'll shoot one that has a big rack but isn't mature :) ,which ever comes first! I just can't see myself ever passing on a 130 inch 2yr old,I'm just not that disciplined.
 
RKenney said:
I still
sort of feel guilty about the 160" buck I killed in 08 that was
aged between 2.5 and 3.5, but I still try to justify it.

If the guilt is too much for ya I could always keep that baby of a buck on my wall for a while,you know...just until the guilt fades. :grin:
 
I too will shoot a buck at 3 1/2 if he has the headgear to satisfy me, and I would absolutely shoot any buck out there regardless of age if he's packing 160 inches of antler or more, he dies. That being said, I pass on 4 1/2+ yr old bucks on occasion because they have subpar racks and dont meet the minimum it takes to make me happy, headgear wise. I try to hunt for bucks by age, but like anything, there are always exceptions!
 
I will shoot any buck 3 1/2 and older. I typically can tell in an instance by looking at the body whether its an older deer or not. I DO look at the antlers and try to identify them from trailcam pictures. I wont shoot a buck unless hes going on the wall. Though I'd be the first to admit that it would be hard for me to pass up a 160" 2 1/2 yo.
 
I look at a deer from the standpoint of "once shot" will i be proud of pulling the trigger on that sized rack or will i say to myself, "i should have waited"......this has enabled me to pass up over 100 bucks in the last 8 seasons. Many were too smal to even consider some were border line and i have never regretted pulling the trigger nor holding off on the shot. I know what i want and i stick to my goals. I am happy with the potential deer we have on our lease and look forward to next season.
 
Whitetail Junkie,
I'm over it now, so I guess I will keep him on my wall. You can
come and look at him anytime you want though. (ha)

That's your pay for dragging him out for me!
 
Whitetail Junkie said:
I'll shoot one that's mature but doesn't have a big rack,and I'll shoot one that has a big rack but isn't mature :) ,which ever comes first! I just can't see myself ever passing on a 130 inch 2yr old,I'm just not that disciplined.
And from Winchester...

Winchester said:
I too will shoot a buck at 3 1/2 if he has the headgear to satisfy me, and I would absolutely shoot any buck out there regardless of age if he's packing 160 inches of antler or more, he dies.

I couldn't agree more. I guess I'm both an antler hunter and an age hunter. I will shoot any buck 3 1/2+ regardless of antlers. But I'll also shoot any large-antlered buck regardless of age.

For instance, despite this 3 1/2 year-old buck's small 6-point rack, if I had seen that thick neck coming through the woods, I would have shot this buck in a heartbeat.

buck0712f.jpg




However, considering the average mature buck in my area only sports a rack grossing between 120 and 125, anything near that score is going down. Here's the average mature buck rack-wise in my area. Anything close to this size rack, even if he is 2 1/2, is probably getting shot!:

4c.jpg


buck0924e.jpg




As I prime example, if I had seen this 2 1/2 year-old buck, I feel confident I would have shot him. He's the biggest 2 1/2 year-old we've ever photographed on my place:

buck0826a.jpg


buck0826e.jpg


buck0826g.jpg
 
BSK said:
As a prime example, if I had seen this 2 1/2 year-old buck, I feel confident I would have shot him. He's the biggest 2 1/2 year-old we've ever photographed on my place . . . .
I rest my case --- that antler high-grading is a HUGE factor as to why we do not have more 150-plus-class mature bucks, despite our having more mature bucks than ever before in Tennessee.

There are different ways of looking at things, different strokes for different folks. That particular 2 1/2 would have been one I'd have been MOST EXCITED to pass, as his antler potential (even at 3 1/2) was unreal. Maybe if I hadn't killed some larger antlered bucks (than that 2 1/2), I'd be seeing it differently, but I find it more exciting to pass up one like that than to take him.

In the meantime, seems most of the mature bucks I'm killing were those 2 1/2-yr-old "look, he's still just a spike" bucks that everyone found easy to let walk. :) Like that 6-pt 3 1/2 above, that may end up as a 115-class mature buck someday.

We all hunt for a myriad of reasons, "trophy" antlers being just one of those. What makes me happiest is in looking forward to something exciting, like sometimes the journey is more enjoyable than the destination, or looking forward to a vacation may actually be more fun than the vacation itself. It's exciting to know there are a few mature bucks around, even more exciting when some of them have huge antlers.
 
Wes Parrish said:
BSK said:
As a prime example, if I had seen this 2 1/2 year-old buck, I feel confident I would have shot him. He's the biggest 2 1/2 year-old we've ever photographed on my place . . . .
I rest my case --- that antler high-grading is a HUGE factor as to why we do not have more 150-plus-class mature bucks, despite our having more mature bucks than ever before in Tennessee.

Very possible Wes. But we actually have more 150+ mature bucks now than we've ever had, simply because we have more mature bucks in the area, upping the odds. Now if antler high-grading wasn't going on, we might have even more 150+ mature bucks than we do now.
 
Wes Parrish said:
...Like that 6-pt 3 1/2 above, that may end up as a 115-class mature buck someday.

Surprisingly, he ended up better than I expected. At 4 1/2 he filled out his rack a little more. He grossed 120 2/8, right at "average" for a mature buck in my area:

08-0611.jpg


buck0806f.jpg


2008Don1a.jpg
 
Wes Parrish said:
There are different ways of looking at things, different strokes for different folks. That particular 2 1/2 would have been one I'd have been MOST EXCITED to pass, as his antler potential (even at 3 1/2) was unreal.

No doubt true. And if I felt confident any buck I pass at 2 1/2 I would have a very good chance of killing at 3 1/2, I might pass him up. However, the odds are not in my favor!


Off the subject, I passed up this fork-horn 2 1/2 year-old several times last year. I wonder what he will look like this year at 3 1/2? I know he survived the season and I'm hoping he's still around this year. I'm just curious how much potential a small-antlered 2 1/2 like this has.
buck0904f.jpg
 
BSK said:
Wes Parrish said:
There are different ways of looking at things, different strokes for different folks. That particular 2 1/2 would have been one I'd have been MOST EXCITED to pass, as his antler potential (even at 3 1/2) was unreal.

No doubt true. And if I felt confident any buck I pass at 2 1/2 I would have a very good chance of killing at 3 1/2, I might pass him up. However, the odds are not in my favor!


Off the subject, I passed up this fork-horn 2 1/2 year-old several times last year. I wonder what he will look like this year at 3 1/2? I know he survived the season and I'm hoping he's still around this year. I'm just curious how much potential a small-antlered 2 1/2 like this has.
buck0904f.jpg
He may very well grow out of it BSK, I have saw bucks like him really pack it on from 2 1/2 to 3 1/2 He looks to be totally healthy amd may pleasantly surprise you this year. And Wes's theory that every buck will continue year after year with the same type rack (growth performance) doesnt always hold water.
For instance, the top end 2 1/2's that normally get shot, and you would love to see what they do next year. On average they may do better than the sub par racked bucks like BSK pictured above, but I have also saw the tables turn, with the smaller 2 1/2's really putting on a lot of antler, while some of my top end 2 1/2's didnt make a big jump and were actually caught at 3 1/2 by some of the average 2 1/2's from the year before. It works both ways and 'high grading' absolutely takes place, but I dont think its nearly as much of a problem, especialy here in TN as Wes portrays it to be. IMO anyway. There is much more at work in what type rack a buck grows each year than simply what he was last year. A myriad of stresses can come into play, or actually be removed from a bucks life from year to year, which affects greatly what type of growth they didplay from year to year.
 
Winchester said:
And Wes's theory that every buck will continue year after year with the same type rack (growth performance) doesnt always hold water.
I have never said that.
But generally speaking, most bucks will usually grow LARGER antlers each year up until they reach 6 1/2.

Exceptions to a buck growing a larger rack from one year to the next are not uncommon.

Winchester said:
There is much more at work in what type rack a buck grows each year than simply what he was last year.
I totally agree.
But they generally will have similar configuration (from 2 1/2 on) and generally grow larger antlers each year. And very rare for a 5 1/2 not to have higher scoring, heavier antlers than he had at 3 1/2 or younger.

Regarding the antler high-grading, I suspect it is not near the issue where you're hunting in East TN as where I'm hunting in Northwestern Middle TN, nor is it anywhere near as much an issue in KY as TN. Personally, I believe many of the deer researchers have "missed the boat" in not focusing more on the effects of antler high-grading, particularly in doing more research on this in the more typical deer hunting situations across the Southeast. Most of their research has been done on tightly controlled ranches in Texas, where the antler high-grading was actually (and purposefully) having the opposite effect of what we're experiencing here in Tennessee. In many cases down there, they're killing NO bucks younger than 3 1/2, then taking out the smallest antlered 3 1/2 & 4 1/2-yr-old bucks, only leaving the largest antlered ones to reach maturity ---- we're doing just the opposite.
 
Wes, why do you feel that antler high grading is so much more of a problem in your area than anywhere else in TN? We all have the same seasons and the same bag limits (Buck wise). I dont disagree that its happening, just not to the degree you do. I also think lumping all bucks together, with the thoughts that they would all continue with either smaller, or larger, antlers per age class than average, for their entire life, is painting with a broad brush. As I stated before, many times a buck can go either way, especially growing out of maybe being a late fawn or having a ruff first year. Anywho, I see the point your driving, but I think maybe your a lil overdrove on it, again just my opinion!
 
Winchester said:
Wes, why do you feel that antler high grading is so much more of a problem in your area than anywhere else in TN? We all have the same seasons and the same bag limits (Buck wise).
I don't necessarily feel that antler high grading is more a problem in my main hunting area than "anywhere else in TN", but do think it's more an issue in my area than in more rugged terrain areas (such as much of East TN).

My main hunting area is an area of large QDM clubs, one club after another joining another, covering many square miles. They are not all practicing the same level of QDM, but I can say most have harvested more female than male deer many years running. I can also say that most bucks age 2 1/2 or younger with below average antlers for their age class are typically allowed to walk by not one, but by multiple hunters, often several different hunters passing the same buck in the same day.

Would also say as a "group" of hunters, hunters in a controlled club situation are commonly hunting "less disturbed" deer (move more in daylight) than hunters who come and go on either public land or where the landowner let's several people hunt who don't know each other.

It may be that the average deer hunter in my "club" circumstance is far more experienced than just the "average TN deer hunter". For example, most of the hunters in this group and surrounding groups each average killing multiple deer annually, probably about 3 a year each on average. Statewide, the average is quite a bit less than one deer annually.

Over the years I've noticed that whenever there is a top-end 2 1/2 (say one scoring around 115 or better), that buck will almost always get killed by the first hunter he walks by. Yet, when a 4-point 2 1/2 is identified, he will be allowed to walk by multiple hunters multiple times over the course of the season.

I would say most of the 2 1/2's survive to 3 1/2, but we're observing similar harvest patterns on the 3 1/2's. The best 3 1/2's are the least likely ones to make it to 4 1/2, while the very small antlered 3 1/2's are repeatedly passed by multiple hunters (just like me and you).

By the time we get to the 4 1/2-yr-old age class, what's left are mostly the smallest of the smallest racked bucks that ran the gauntlet of hunters as 2 1/2's and 3 1/2's. Yes, it is possible for a genetically superior antlered young buck to survive to 4 1/2 or older, just saying it seldom happens in my hunting area.

This may be antedotal, but something many can relate.
Why is it that so many of our top-end antler scoring records were set back decades ago when our statewide deer population was maybe 100 times less, and the annual deer harvest was less than 1% what it is today?

Note that the TN state record typical was killed in 1959. The highest scoring bucks from the Catoosa WMA have not been killed following years of QDM, were not killed when Catoosa had a high deer population pre-QDM, but were in fact killed back in the 1960's, or was it the '50's? Part of the answer may have to do with age. But I suspect less high-grading back then made it more likely for a genetically superior young buck to survive to maturity.

And then why is it that most of the records being broken today (in lots of states) are being broken by bucks that are only 3 1/2 or 4 1/2 years old? Remember that "world record" Milo Hansen buck? 3 1/2. The answer to this question is simply because we have so many more deer that we're more likely to encounter that 1 in 1,000,000 that grows a 180-plus rack at a young age. But "imagine" what those could become by 5 1/2.

Winchester said:
As I stated before, many times a buck can go either way, especially growing out of maybe being a late fawn or having a ruff first year.
Very true.
However, "when born" (early or late), stress, and food supply become lesser issues by 4 1/2 or older.
 
Wes, I see your train of thought and it may very well be along the lines of reality. I think our problem here however was created by hunters ourselves, with the mindset that we have instilled in many hunters today. I think a lot of hunters and especially the fledgling managers are trying to hard to be something, and their not really sure exactly what that is. We have way too many wanna be chiefs, and not nearly enough indians these days. And that is in no way a derogitory remark towards you or anybody else here, as I think we have somme pretty sharp individuals here, but its a fact of the matter.
I see no real solution to our problem however, because whatever age deer we decide to hold out for, everybody wants to shoot the top end bucks in that age group, just like you and I do! Until everybody waits until every buck they kill is fully mature (4 1/2) the problem will always be there to some extent. You and I both know that will never happen anyway, so???
 

Latest posts

Back
Top