Quailman said:
pass-thru said:
BigGameGuy said:
Hunter 257W said:
If the deer feel secure eating your plots, they will eat more of the high protein feed and less wild stuff which contains less protein.
This is actually a misconception that was probably the product of false advertising by seed companies.
You have made a couple of blanket statements here, and I don't see how they are relevant to discussion regarding specific crops. . . . . . .
Pass-thru, there is tons of data collected right here in TN that provides proof that many native plants provide nutrition that rivals anything planted for a food plot. . . . . .
For example, some of the more preferred native plants are:
Common Ragweed - crude protein 18-22%
Pokeweed - crude protein 30+%
. . . . . . The list goes on and on. Also, the TDN (total digestible nutrients) is very high on these plants, meaning they are easily digestible and nutrients are readily available to the animal eating these plants.
Quailman has hit all the nails on their heads and speaks the truth (same for BGG).
I've many times observed deer totally ignore my lush clover plots only to pick out and consume the native ragweed, growing in and around my lush clover. Now, I'm sure if that native ragweed (or some other native forb high in protein) was
NOT available, my clover would be much more attractive.
But I will make a "blanket" statement:
Perhaps the best and most economical method of creating better nutrition for your local deer herd is to simply allow more sunlight to hit the ground. Better yet if you can "disturb" the soil so that more native plant seed lying dormant may sprout; better yet if you can mow lots of acreage at least once annually; and often even better yet if you can add some lime.
I'm saying this in the context that most food plot addicts tend to have only a tiny percentage of their available acreage in cultivated food plots, with their limiting factors often being money and time to do more. Say you have 2 acres on a 100-acre area in cultivated food plots. Would it be better to have 20 acres of "more native" food-plot-type areas, created mainly by mowing, disturbing the soil (such as by light discing)? Sometimes it can be more feasible to have 20 acres of more "native" plots instead of 2 acres of very expensive cultivated plots.
I think that our cultivated food plots often work well simply because we're not addressing creating the greater availability of more native food sources. If I have a 2-acre cultivated food plot surrounded by 200 acres of mature hardwoods, that little food plot should get hammered. But I could create a lot more year-round deer food by simply clear-cutting 20 acres of those hardwoods, then doing some rotational mowing in the clear-cut areas in the subsequent years.
Another point that is often overlooked:
The vastness of availability. We can have more better nutrition available to more deer simply by having it
more available over larger areas. And related to this is "security", particular during hunting season, as the older deer will prefer greater security over more palatable food sources.
This past deer season, despite my belief that deer prefer lush clover, oats, and wheat over honeysuckle, most of the deer seemed perfectly content consuming honeysuckle during the daylight hours of deer season. I had never before seen so much honeysuckle, and the deer sure took advantage of it. Will also add those deer did hammer our food plots, too, but mainly at night. I suspect we would have killed a lot more older bucks had we had no cultivated food plots at all.
There are many ways to skin a cat, not just those "advertised".