Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
First blood or first lethal hit?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ski" data-source="post: 5759999" data-attributes="member: 20583"><p>With 4 holes in the deer, who's to say which hole belongs to which hunter? And since he was the only one cutting in to "autopsy" the deer as he claimed, then he's singly responsible for interpretation of the evidence. Given the circumstances how could anybody reasonably trust his assessment? There's really no way to know how many holes were in the buck or where they were placed. We only have his word, and I'm not ready to trust that.</p><p></p><p>Regardless of who the deer belongs to, it's tainted. I bet he wishes he could go back and do things differently. Is everyone to believe the woman and her husband are just making all this up to be rotten? There's a reason they raised a stink and it's not because the guy was being fair.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ski, post: 5759999, member: 20583"] With 4 holes in the deer, who's to say which hole belongs to which hunter? And since he was the only one cutting in to "autopsy" the deer as he claimed, then he's singly responsible for interpretation of the evidence. Given the circumstances how could anybody reasonably trust his assessment? There's really no way to know how many holes were in the buck or where they were placed. We only have his word, and I'm not ready to trust that. Regardless of who the deer belongs to, it's tainted. I bet he wishes he could go back and do things differently. Is everyone to believe the woman and her husband are just making all this up to be rotten? There's a reason they raised a stink and it's not because the guy was being fair. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
First blood or first lethal hit?
Top