Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
First blood or first lethal hit?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ski" data-source="post: 5759751" data-attributes="member: 20583"><p>That's just it. She and her husband claims she hit the buck twice, once lethally. They also claim to have found hair and blood which is what they were following. </p><p></p><p>If the deer wasn't mortally wounded and a blood trail leading to it, how did the second hunter find it so fast? He claims the leg wound was his first shot but neither the woman nor her husband saw the buck limping. It doesn't add up. The leg wound very well could have been one of his follow up shots that nobody else saw. There were 4 holes in the buck. She says she hit it twice and he says he hit it twice. </p><p></p><p>Being a woman doesn't change how I feel about it at all. It's too bad the other hunter felt like he could bull her, and her limpdick husband allowed it. But I wasn't there and don't know the vibes of the situation. If they felt potentially threatened then no deer is worth escalating the tensions. </p><p></p><p>I do agree with OL firing him. Doesn't look good on them at all if they turned a blind eye. I'm glad they had the balls to tell him get lost.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ski, post: 5759751, member: 20583"] That's just it. She and her husband claims she hit the buck twice, once lethally. They also claim to have found hair and blood which is what they were following. If the deer wasn't mortally wounded and a blood trail leading to it, how did the second hunter find it so fast? He claims the leg wound was his first shot but neither the woman nor her husband saw the buck limping. It doesn't add up. The leg wound very well could have been one of his follow up shots that nobody else saw. There were 4 holes in the buck. She says she hit it twice and he says he hit it twice. Being a woman doesn't change how I feel about it at all. It's too bad the other hunter felt like he could bull her, and her limpdick husband allowed it. But I wasn't there and don't know the vibes of the situation. If they felt potentially threatened then no deer is worth escalating the tensions. I do agree with OL firing him. Doesn't look good on them at all if they turned a blind eye. I'm glad they had the balls to tell him get lost. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
First blood or first lethal hit?
Top