Diehard Hunter":2v2mteyt said:
Y'all can bat it around all you want. If you shoot it, you have just taken someone else's property and the law is on their side! No different than mistaking that Jersey calf for a deer. You would pay for the calf too!
GENERALLY SPEAKING, I would agree about the law, but we're not talking about mistaking a Jersey calf for a deer.
I'm talking about shooting a deer during a legal deer season by a hunter who is legal to be deer hunting.
In the context of an open deer season,
and a hunter NOT seeing that ear tag, and
that hunter believing he was shooting a wild, free-roaming deer, the law becomes on "his" side when his actions are judged by a jury of
his peers.
I am agreeing, the law is initially on the side of the owner of the captive deer, and would remain there if the shooter
knowingly shot his escaped captive deer. Just saying it
COULD be very easy for a legal hunter to have no reason to believe he was shooting anything but a truly wild deer when he pulled the trigger.
WRbowhunter":2v2mteyt said:
I'm just confused on why you would want to shoot it. If its following you around then its pretty tame.
You wouldn't want to shoot it, if you knew it was a "tame" deer (or at least most hunters wouldn't).
But what if you were hunting a WMA, and the buck of a lifetime comes chasing a hot doe by you at first light, you shoot, simply believing you've killed the buck of your lifetime. Have you done anything wrong, provided you didn't know in advance you were shooting an escaped "tame" deer?
Even if we were talking Jersey cows, if your Jersey cow escapes its fence, and I accidently run over it on the highway, the owner of the cow becomes liable for my damages. The cow, like the deer, was in a place it shouldn't have been.