Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Off Topic TN Forums
Sports talk
Doggies versus Bammers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="poorhunter" data-source="post: 5781804" data-attributes="member: 16537"><p>Sure without a doubt…because they got into the playoffs. Winning the national championship doesn't mean they are (or were) the best team. While there are certainly some concrete objective points to consider, who gets in the playoffs is highly subjective in college football. I come from the Big Ten, and I can readily say that SEC football is better than the Big Ten, but that in no way means that in any given year that the top SEC team is "better" than the top Big Ten team.</p><p>As I sit and listen to the arguments for this team or against that team, it's it's so wonderfully entertaining to see how different years determine which way one wants to emphasize what. One year someone wants to emphasize "we need the best teams in the playoffs", and the next year "we need the best resumes in the playoffs". The best teams are not necessarily the teams with the best resumes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="poorhunter, post: 5781804, member: 16537"] Sure without a doubt…because they got into the playoffs. Winning the national championship doesn’t mean they are (or were) the best team. While there are certainly some concrete objective points to consider, who gets in the playoffs is highly subjective in college football. I come from the Big Ten, and I can readily say that SEC football is better than the Big Ten, but that in no way means that in any given year that the top SEC team is “better” than the top Big Ten team. As I sit and listen to the arguments for this team or against that team, it’s it’s so wonderfully entertaining to see how different years determine which way one wants to emphasize what. One year someone wants to emphasize “we need the best teams in the playoffs”, and the next year “we need the best resumes in the playoffs”. The best teams are not necessarily the teams with the best resumes. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Off Topic TN Forums
Sports talk
Doggies versus Bammers
Top