Do two wrongs make a right?
JMcB said:
If a state agency can import deer for farming and permitted hunts, does anyone think an individual (southernspur hunter) should be allowed the same opportunity?
IMO, while this is a valid question, it is both out of context, and like comparing an apple to an orange.
Our state has not imported any deer since the dangers of CWD became so well documented.
How many years has it been since the State of TN last imported a deer? Our state is currently not doing this, so it is not an issue of "if they can, why can't I." But when they did, it was for the purpose of re-establishing native deer (and/or elk) to the public wildlife coffers, not for the purpose of "selling hunts, selling meat, or breeder bucks for profit".
Am I wrong in believing this whole issue of "deer farming" is more about a very few people making money from the sale of large-antlered "breeder bucks" (for the purpose of creating more large-antlered bucks to be shot in a fenced enclosure under the guise of hunting)
rather than much to do with the sale of venison as a food item?
"Permitted hunts"?
I assume the permitted hunts being referenced are the six (6) annual elk permits that the State sells or raffles for the purpose of re-establishing/maintaining Tennessee's once native free-roaming elk herd?
If so, is this even a valid comparison to commercially selling "hunts" inside a fenced enclosure?
I do realize everything cannot be either "good" or "bad" and that there are some good points made for commercially raising deer and offering "canned" hunts. Just remains my opinion that the bad points outweigh the good, especially for the general public, who are not among those asking for commercial deer farms and high-fenced hunting.