woodsman04
Well-Known Member
Not trying to make light of the situation.
But if there is any positive for the average income hunters that struggle with leases and competition on public land, this has to be one.
I would not trade the disease though for this. I'd rather have more deer and more hunters than just overall not many deer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But if there is any positive for the average income hunters that struggle with leases and competition on public land, this has to be one.
I would not trade the disease though for this. I'd rather have more deer and more hunters than just overall not many deer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk