Cull Bucks

Tennessee Deer Sporting & Deer Hunting Community Forum

Help Support TNDeer | Tennessee Deer:

Grizzly Johnson

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
16,436
City & State/Province
Tennessee
Got this from a Conservation guy at work and thought I would share if you guys care to read.....

What is a �Cull� Buck?
Craig Harper, Professor, Wildlife Management

Tennessee deer hunters now kill more deer annually than at any time in history. With a
burgeoning deer population, it is no longer a real challenge for most hunters to merely kill a deer.
Most hunters today yearn for big bucks��trophy bucks��and a hunting experience that mimics
those seen on cable television hunting shows. Unfortunately, many of those shows have portrayed
misconceptions and fostered unrealistic expectations for many hunters. Terms such as �cull buck,�
�management buck,� and �trophy buck� are bantered about as if every viewer is able to
distinguish them for removal from the population with precision. Sometimes, no, usually, it is
evident those on TV do not understand these terms either. This has caused much confusion among
hunters who are often trying to practice Quality Deer Management.
The terms �cull buck,� �management buck,� and �trophy buck� were first used (and still
are) on large ranches in Texas where deer herds are managed to produce an abundance of fully
mature bucks (5 � 8 years old), many of which may grow large enough to quality for the Boone &
Crockett Club�s Big Game Records Book. On most of these ranches, deer hunting is fee-based.
That is, hunters pay a handsome amount to hunt, and often an additional fee is charged if a buck is
killed. The price usually varies per size of the buck.
By definition, �management bucks� and �trophy bucks� are mature animals differentiated
only by antler size. Neither is taken before the buck is at least 5, and usually 6, years old. For
example, a 6-year-old buck that measures (or scores) 145 B&C inches would be considered a
�management buck,� and the cost of killing this buck would be much less than a 6-year-old buck
that scores 180 B&C inches, which would be considered a �trophy buck.�
A �cull buck� is one that does not meet certain antler criteria within a specific age class.
For example, on King Ranch, Kingsville, TX, a �cull buck� is defined as any buck with at least
one unbranched antler, any buck >3 years old with 7 or fewer antler points, any buck >4 years old
with 8 or fewer antler points, and any buck >5 years old that scores under 130 B&C inches. Age
of live deer is estimated based on body characteristics. These criteria are used because bucks that
meet these criteria have virtually no chance of developing antlers large enough to qualify for
B&C. These criteria are maintained on King Ranch to provide more hunting recreation, not
to influence genetics.
Prior to implementing these criteria, hunters on King Ranch harvested 300 bucks annually,
nearly all of which were considered �trophy-class.� Now, with the culling criteria in place, 1,000 �
1,500 bucks are harvested annually. That is, nearly 80% of the bucks killed are considered �culls.�
The removal of these bucks, however, has not influenced the number of trophy-class
animals in the population. And after an intensive 10-year research project where hunters and
managers worked intensively to remove all �cull bucks� as possible on a 10,000-acre area of the
King Ranch, culling produced no change in average antler characteristics by age class. This is
very pertinent for landowners and hunters on small or large properties.
This research has shown hunters should not try to cull bucks with what are deemed
undesirable antler characteristics (such as spikes, forkhorns, and �scrub bucks�) in an effort to
influence antler characteristics within a given area. Research has also shown yearling bucks with
relatively small antlers produce racks the vast majority of hunters would be proud of by the time
the deer reach 3 or 4 years old (100 � 130 B&C inches or more). Those bucks may not produce
antlers that would qualify for the B&C Record Book, but they are being shot well before they
would produce their largest set of antlers (6 or 7 years old) anyway.
Instead of worrying about genetics, hunters interested in larger bucks should allow
all bucks to reach at least 3 years of age before harvest. No buck can express his genetic
potential until he reaches maturity with adequate nutrition. Every animal is unique and should be
viewed with respect. Every mature buck should be viewed as a �trophy.� Age should be regarded
more highly by hunters than antler dimensions.
 
Wow,that was a lot of typing,buy a good story.Not ever gonna have the need to cull bucks around here,I would not think,and from the article,sounds like they dont either.Sounds almost like a way for them to "sell" smaller bucks.But this is America,the market will dictate if they can do it or not.
 
And these comments are key (which I fully agree with):

"These criteria are maintained on the King Ranch to provide more hunting recreation, not to influence genetics.

Prior to implementing these criteria, hunters on King Ranch harvested 300 bucks annually, nearly all of which were considered �trophy-class.� Now, with the culling criteria in place, 1,000 � 1,500 bucks are harvested annually.

The removal of these bucks, however, has not influenced the number of trophy-class animals in the population
."
 
Football Hunter said:
Sounds almost like a way for them to "sell" smaller bucks.

Mick Hellickson, the head biologist at the King Ranch, will tell you that "management" and "cull" bucks are exactly that--the chance to sell smaller bucks. It is the chance to sell hunts at the King Ranch at a discount price. It's all economics.
 
BSK said:
Football Hunter said:
Sounds almost like a way for them to "sell" smaller bucks.

Mick Hellickson, the head biologist at the King Ranch, will tell you that "management" and "cull" bucks are exactly that--the chance to sell smaller bucks. It is the chance to sell hunts at the King Ranch at a discount price. It's all economics.
And im not against it,its a free market,I love it!
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I have seen many 1.5 bucks killed over the last few years. Many
of the hunters say " I killed him because he is a cull buck". I
don't say anything to them, but in my mind, I am thinking, why is
that a cull buck.

Why try to defend killing a deer that has a small rack, by using
that statement. Just say I killed him.....because I wanted to. I
never question anyone's kill, because I remember the "old days".

If the hunter is really thrilled and happy about their deer, I am
happy for them. Just don't try to justify the reason you took
that particular deer.
 
Dalton Ballentine said:
agreed RK but we need to limit the number of cull or any other size bucks they can shoot in a year. Hopefully to 2

I would have no problem with that.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top