http://www.gon.com/article.php?id=347
Great read for those interested in some studies of coyote impact!!!!!
Eye opening!
Great read for those interested in some studies of coyote impact!!!!!
Eye opening!
RKenney said:Graphs and charts are a great tool, no doubt, but but night time
kills by "packs" of coyotes.....sometimes can't be "charted".
camoman270 said:http://www.gon.com/article.php?id=347
Great read for those interested in some studies of coyote impact!!!!!
Eye opening!
I know what you are saying about the not being able to use snares all over the state but, I can't find it in the hunting/ trapping/ guide this year but I could be wrong. If you see it let me know.ChippewaPartners said:One of the finest methods of growing deer herds is a head-high pile of coyote and bobcat pelts headed to market. It usually takes more experienced trappers to pound down coyote populations, bobcats can be caught by nearly anyone.
On a related note, look at the elk calf recruitment in Yellowstone Park and see what a mess that will be in just a few more years as the herd matures, from the wolves and bear.
My trapping gang in Cumberland County has knocked out a few coyotes and bobcats under some tough trapping conditions this past week. If snares were legal across the entire state it would sure help. And that is something all deer hunters can lobby TWRA for. The politics involved with the snaring issue in some counties defy common-sense big-game management, as snares are extremely effective on coyotes and bobcats.
BSK said:RKenney said:Graphs and charts are a great tool, no doubt, but but night time
kills by "packs" of coyotes.....sometimes can't be "charted".
Anything can be charted with the right study design. I realize it is Human Nature to trust "common sense" over charts and graphs, but science--the only way know anything with certainty--is charts and graphs. It is a process of converting natural processes into numeric forms so they can be tracked and tested.
If we rely on common sense alone we will miss much of what is really happening. The more Nature is studied the more we find it doesn't work by common sense rules but by processes complex beyond our wildlest dreams. Only charts and graphs can decipher that complexity.
megalomaniac said:Don't get me wrong... I'm a data freak also. But before you accept any study as gospel, make sure you understand the design, it's flaws, and whether it really is statistically significant.
megalomaniac said:Don't get me wrong... I'm a data freak also. But before you accept any study as gospel, make sure you understand the design, it's flaws, and whether it really is statistically significant.
You are right but, a considerable difference can be made in a coyote population with an extensive trapping program.megalomaniac said:Neat thing about coyotes' biology. They're population dependent, just as deer are... but in times of plenty they can alter their litter size. I've heard reports of up to 15 pups/ litter. It may therefore be possible to alter their population short-term... but they're only a year or two away from repopulating right back to where they were before.
camoman270 said:Good point buckdead, when i first got in the lease in wayne county we had more turkeys than i had ever seen in my lifetime and i am not exagerrating any. around every curve in the road was a flock and it wasnt uncommon to see upwards on 100 birds every trip. now i have been 45 times since and including bow season in the last of each three seasons and cant hardly see more than one flock. I am really concerned about "what" is happening to them. I dont hunt them with any regularity in turkey season but have taken one with the Hoyt razor tec and would kill more in bow season should the opportunity present itself. I wonder about the impact of armadillos on turkey eggs since that is the only variable that has changed since then. Arma populations have skyrocketed!!!!!!!!!
camoman270 said:BGG.........any studies done on armadillo effects on turkey eggs?