Grundy.308
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2015
- Messages
- 112
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Cam Check #2
- Thread starter Grundy.308
- Start date
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Buck_West
Well-Known Member
Re: Cam Check #2
I would say they have gone way down hill over the course of 8 years since all of those deer should be over 10 according to date. But seriously you have 2 very nice bucks I would hang on the wall. The 8 won't score anything much simply because he is an 8 point without long tines but I would say that 10 is in the 130 neighborhood. I would say both are 3.5.
I would say they have gone way down hill over the course of 8 years since all of those deer should be over 10 according to date. But seriously you have 2 very nice bucks I would hang on the wall. The 8 won't score anything much simply because he is an 8 point without long tines but I would say that 10 is in the 130 neighborhood. I would say both are 3.5.
TheLBLman
Well-Known Member
Re: Cam Check #2
Challenging for me to conclude much here, as different pics/angles make them look younger or older.
The two largest are probably a 3 1/2 & a 4 1/2,
but could be a 2 1/2 & a 3 1/2.
And I wouldn't argue the possibility of both being 3 1/2.
Only things I can say with near certainty is the smaller (of the two largest) is no younger than 2 1/2,
the larger is no younger than 3 1/2, and it's even possible they're 4 1/2 & 5 1/2.
Do you have any pics of these from last year?
That would be the best step now towards any aging accuracy.
Challenging for me to conclude much here, as different pics/angles make them look younger or older.
The two largest are probably a 3 1/2 & a 4 1/2,
but could be a 2 1/2 & a 3 1/2.
And I wouldn't argue the possibility of both being 3 1/2.
Only things I can say with near certainty is the smaller (of the two largest) is no younger than 2 1/2,
the larger is no younger than 3 1/2, and it's even possible they're 4 1/2 & 5 1/2.
Do you have any pics of these from last year?
That would be the best step now towards any aging accuracy.
Grundy.308
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2015
- Messages
- 112
Re: Cam Check #2
Sadly don't have any pics from last year this is only the second year of my salt lick I put it in last year so it's just over a year old I'm guessing they found it then and are tearing it up now
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sadly don't have any pics from last year this is only the second year of my salt lick I put it in last year so it's just over a year old I'm guessing they found it then and are tearing it up now
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
spmuddin323
Well-Known Member
Re: Cam Check #2
good looking bucks.
too small give him another year or two. lolspmuddin323":30yw17qy said:
good looking bucks.
Grundy.308
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2015
- Messages
- 112
Re: Cam Check #2
That's a nice deer muddin
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's a nice deer muddin
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
spmuddin323
Well-Known Member
Re: Cam Check #2
Grundy.308":5w3jqoon said:
Re: Cam Check #2
The deer in that last pic might make you loose some sleep! He is a nice buck!
The deer in that last pic might make you loose some sleep! He is a nice buck!
wobblegobble
Well-Known Member
Re: Cam Check #2
They all look the same age to me...none older than 3.5
They all look the same age to me...none older than 3.5
