Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Trail Cams & Pic's
Branches in antlers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BSK" data-source="post: 5216009" data-attributes="member: 17"><p>Yes, I no longer use still images at all. Although video resolution is not as good as still images, I've found the "mind's eye" can identify a moving buck's antler configuration quite easily, even in much lower resolution video than higher resolution still images. Also, now I don't have to worry about getting a series of night images that are too motion blurred to see the buck's antlers clearly. In addition, I'm seeing more deer in the video and learning SO much more about deer behavior with video over still images.</p><p></p><p>The only downsides I've found to using video are: 1) it takes MUCH longer to go through all the videos and record the data I collect from trail-cams; and 2) you better have some serious digital storage available! A single 20 second video can be 100 MB in size. A 10 second, 50 MB. When I checked cameras Friday I had over 1,200 videos to go through! That takes a long time and requires a heck of a lot of digital storage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BSK, post: 5216009, member: 17"] Yes, I no longer use still images at all. Although video resolution is not as good as still images, I've found the "mind's eye" can identify a moving buck's antler configuration quite easily, even in much lower resolution video than higher resolution still images. Also, now I don't have to worry about getting a series of night images that are too motion blurred to see the buck's antlers clearly. In addition, I'm seeing more deer in the video and learning SO much more about deer behavior with video over still images. The only downsides I've found to using video are: 1) it takes MUCH longer to go through all the videos and record the data I collect from trail-cams; and 2) you better have some serious digital storage available! A single 20 second video can be 100 MB in size. A 10 second, 50 MB. When I checked cameras Friday I had over 1,200 videos to go through! That takes a long time and requires a heck of a lot of digital storage. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Trail Cams & Pic's
Branches in antlers
Top