I know quality deer management has alot to do with letting your
bucks reach their potential, but I have a hard time not killing a buck with a good set of "horns" (ha). I killed my best buck of
life this year (160" gross-green), but he was aged by many at
2.5 and by some (after they saw the pic) at 3.5.
I was thrill and very proud to have killed this buck, but a
little bit of damper was put on it when I realized that I had
killed a juvenile buck.
BSK has said that teeth aging is not an exact science, but I
often wonder what this deer would have been at 5.5 or 6.5.
And yes, he was a Maury Co. Tennessee deer.
bucks reach their potential, but I have a hard time not killing a buck with a good set of "horns" (ha). I killed my best buck of
life this year (160" gross-green), but he was aged by many at
2.5 and by some (after they saw the pic) at 3.5.
I was thrill and very proud to have killed this buck, but a
little bit of damper was put on it when I realized that I had
killed a juvenile buck.
BSK has said that teeth aging is not an exact science, but I
often wonder what this deer would have been at 5.5 or 6.5.
And yes, he was a Maury Co. Tennessee deer.