Any reason you're considering that size over a subcompact? I've got 35hp & 21hp Kubota tractors and can't think of anything food plot related that the 21hp can't do equally as well as the 35hp, except it weighs 1,000lbs less so it doesn't compact the soil nearly as much. I've never once heard that little engine load while running in low 1 or 2.
My 35hp shines when I'm skidding big logs down to my sawmill, or when I'm excavating ground with the bucket. For skidding, the tractor weight is less sussceptible to being jerked around when the heavy logs roll or shift. For excavating, it's weight is nice because it doesn't lose traction as much as the lighter tractor. Even though both are 4x4 the lighter tractor's tires will simply spin on the surface of the ground when encountering something heavy or hard, where the heavier tractor will dig on in.
But for tilling, discing, culti-packing, clearing brush, mowing, spreading/leveling gravel, storm clean up, etc., the 21hp does everything the 35hp can do equally well and has never been starved for power while doing it. Furthermore, a subcompact costs around $20K while a 35-40hp costs around $40K. That $20K difference could buy a box blade, disc, bush hog, tiller, and maybe even a stump grinder or brush grapple as well. That's a whole lot of various capabilities for the same price the larger tractor by itself.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to talk you out of a bigger, sexier tractor. There's nothing sexy or manly about a grown man on a tiny tractor. But dollar for dollar you can get a whole lot more variety of work from the subcompact. Just food for thought.