Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Baiting Bill HB1618/SB1942
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="13pt" data-source="post: 5853140" data-attributes="member: 19602"><p>Ok, my bad. I interpret "way down the list" as a "long list." It seems synonymous, but that's just me. As I stated, almost everything you mentioned falls under the category of determent to wildlife. I do see one that could be a separate list item. I can see your point about easier for predators to attack, so I guess we'll call it a very short list. And just because your personal list doesn't include "making it easier for hunters", or that you even give it any credibility, doesn't mean it's not a real issue for some on here, as it's been expressed several times. My post was directed at those. Clearly, this is something that would be on the list on everything in this thread, and from what I've read, it would be #2 or #3 on the overall list. I'm not critiquing your argument of the detriment to wildlife, though I believe, generally speaking, that argument is given too much strength...I'm just speaking to those who feel it should not be legal because it gives hunters too much advantage. So, just ignore my post entirely, it's definitely not directed at you. You have made great arguable points to the detriment of wildlife; it's appreciated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="13pt, post: 5853140, member: 19602"] Ok, my bad. I interpret "way down the list" as a "long list." It seems synonymous, but that's just me. As I stated, almost everything you mentioned falls under the category of determent to wildlife. I do see one that could be a separate list item. I can see your point about easier for predators to attack, so I guess we'll call it a very short list. And just because your personal list doesn't include "making it easier for hunters", or that you even give it any credibility, doesn't mean it's not a real issue for some on here, as it's been expressed several times. My post was directed at those. Clearly, this is something that would be on the list on everything in this thread, and from what I've read, it would be #2 or #3 on the overall list. I'm not critiquing your argument of the detriment to wildlife, though I believe, generally speaking, that argument is given too much strength...I'm just speaking to those who feel it should not be legal because it gives hunters too much advantage. So, just ignore my post entirely, it's definitely not directed at you. You have made great arguable points to the detriment of wildlife; it's appreciated. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Baiting Bill HB1618/SB1942
Top