does private land actually contribute more of a return than public? What I'm getting at is, even tho folks own land, and it is private property, doesn't necessarily mean that it's pristine, non violated, virgin hunting paradise. What acreage would you feel would be large enough to actually have that "untouched" area that only the landowner, or designees, could hunt w/o being subjected to public hunting land issues, such as trespassers/poachers? I do own the property I hunt on, but barely consider it private for the constant influx of trespassers and poachers. Opinions welcome.
Oh, I'm hunting a total of about 42 acres btw, but surrounded by other family members property totaling a little over 120 ac.
Oh, I'm hunting a total of about 42 acres btw, but surrounded by other family members property totaling a little over 120 ac.