Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Arguments for low grading inferior 2 year old bucks?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="catman529" data-source="post: 4528578" data-attributes="member: 9284"><p>I think 2.5 is still too young to get a real idea of anger potential since they were likely still growing their body while their rack grew. I do get excited to see a top end 2.5 year old, I'm sure a good portion of high grade bucks do grow up to be bigger than the lower grade 2 year olds. I am sure it varies too much to really judge a deer that hasn't reached its potential yet. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="catman529, post: 4528578, member: 9284"] I think 2.5 is still too young to get a real idea of anger potential since they were likely still growing their body while their rack grew. I do get excited to see a top end 2.5 year old, I'm sure a good portion of high grade bucks do grow up to be bigger than the lower grade 2 year olds. I am sure it varies too much to really judge a deer that hasn't reached its potential yet. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Arguments for low grading inferior 2 year old bucks?
Top