Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Agree or Disagree?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DeerCamp" data-source="post: 5823391" data-attributes="member: 21011"><p>I hunt Oklahoma every year. They do have a 2 buck limit, but it's not like ours.</p><p></p><p> It's 1 per weapons season, max of 2 total. If you kill one with a rifle, you'd have to kill the other with Archery or MZL. As an out of state hunter, this would mean buying another $300 license. </p><p></p><p>The deer hunting IS better in Oklahoma, but it's not because of limits. I'd argue that it's not even really genetics or soil quality. </p><p></p><p>The main difference in Oklahoma is size of parcels. In TN, it seems like every piece of property is broken up into 10-40 acres, and somebody hunts every one of them. In OK, I hunt 3 parcels that together are over 1,000 acres. </p><p></p><p>If almost no one shoots 2 deer in Oklahoma, then I don't see a strong argument for changing the limit. Wasn't this his argument?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DeerCamp, post: 5823391, member: 21011"] I hunt Oklahoma every year. They do have a 2 buck limit, but it's not like ours. It's 1 per weapons season, max of 2 total. If you kill one with a rifle, you'd have to kill the other with Archery or MZL. As an out of state hunter, this would mean buying another $300 license. The deer hunting IS better in Oklahoma, but it's not because of limits. I'd argue that it's not even really genetics or soil quality. The main difference in Oklahoma is size of parcels. In TN, it seems like every piece of property is broken up into 10-40 acres, and somebody hunts every one of them. In OK, I hunt 3 parcels that together are over 1,000 acres. If almost no one shoots 2 deer in Oklahoma, then I don't see a strong argument for changing the limit. Wasn't this his argument? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Agree or Disagree?
Top