Age this jawbone please

Tennessee Deer Sporting & Deer Hunting Community Forum

Help Support TNDeer | Tennessee Deer:

username

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 8, 2002
Messages
4,098
City & State/Province
Williamson County
007.jpg

006-1.jpg
 
Kind of a tweener. At least 3 1/2 and shows some wear that suggests 4 1/2 (wear on 5th tooth [2nd molar]). But I personally like to go with a minimum age, so I would put that deer at 3 1/2.
 
I will go with 4.5, because the 1st & 2nd molars, and the back cusp of the last molar all look 4.5 to me, and if I am not mistaken, known age comparisons shows that erring on the side of the deer being older tends to be significantly more accurate....
 
I'm confident he was 4 1/2 but when looking at the jawbone, I couldn't really identify for certain either way. I'm still learning how to age the jawbone though. It seems everyone I pull could fall within 2 age categories.

As for this buck, I've passed him up the last two seasons. He was at least 2 1/2 in 07. I had a suspicion that he may be 5 1/2 but looking at the jawbone pretty much ruled that out.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Here is another one that has me perplexed. This deer was almost certainly 3 1/2 but the jawbone looks to me that it could be 2 1/2 and 3 1/2. Btw, I passed him in 08 as a 100-110 class 5X4 and this year he was still a 5X4 that grossed 129 7/8.

004.jpg

005.jpg
 
Yeah that second one would be a very hard sell for 3.5 based on the jawbone. Do you have pics of the bucks?
 
Also both bucks weighed in the 160's field dressed which would normally almost rule out the possibility of 2 1/2 but not this year. I know of some incredible body weights this year.

I beleive BSK's group killed a 2 1/2 that would weigh at least that.
 
As seems to be so commonly the case, we're running into "wondering" if a buck was "x" or "y" age, based on his tooth wear.

I feel comfortable saying both were 3 1/2 or older.
But the older a buck may be, the less likely we are going to be in "guessing" (and that's all this tooth wear aging really is) the exact age.
 
I would really have no problem with 4 1/2 on the first jawbone. It's definitely a tweener. But I would have certainly said 2 1/2 on the second jaw, even though that buck is obviously older than 2 1/2. Once again, proof that toothwear should be looked at as a minimum age and not an exact age.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top