I was pretty sure he was 3 when I killed him, but after looking at the teeth and the overall body structure (not size) I'm not surprised if he's 2. He wasn't eating soft grass either, plenty of acorn bits in the stomach so I think the teeth would be more worn if he was 3. My guess is it's just a big bodied creek bottom deer living on good soil with plenty of nutrition.lpo1981 said:I'll go out on a limb and say 3.5 just judging off his body size.. You don't see I many 2.5's with a body size or structure like that.. But it is possible...
x2 I beleive so as well . Could be a very early born 2.5 though I guess . Without the teeth I would have said 3.5 no question . But Im like you Cat , the teeth have me all confused .ROUGH COUNTRY HUNTER said:My guess is 3 1/2.