Age these 2 plz

[pledbetter]

I think theyre both plenty old enough for me to kill , but I really like the one with the funky rack

 

[pledbetter]

 

[TheLBLman]

Just based on the dates (assumed correct) and those pics,
all I could say is 2 1/2 or older.

 

[Nhill]

I am pure amateur, but I say both 2.5

 

[in the dog house]

I say one is 2.5 the other ( closest in 1st pic ) is 3.5

 

[BluegrassDan]

I say one is 2.5 the other ( closest in 1st pic ) is 3.5

I agree. 2.5 for the normal racked deer. 3.5 for the funky one.

 

[Planking]

I say one is 2.5 the other ( closest in 1st pic ) is 3.5

I agree. 2.5 for the normal racked deer. 3.5 for the funky one.

x3

 

[catman529]

They both look 3.5 to me

 

[pledbetter]

Im thinkin 3 1/2 on the 8 . Maybe older on the funky rack...i say that because of another 8 we got pics of in the same spot (posted under pics forum also)..pretty certain he's 2 1/2 , he actually walked within 30 ft or so of my GF and me this afternoon

Honestly , I have a hard time aging deer when they hit the 3-5 yr old range

 

[Bottom Hunter]

2.5...judging by the body alone.

 

[Mike Belt]

2.5

 

[Deer Assassin]

2.5 as well

 

[bowriter]

Just looking at the bodies, all I could really be sure of they are both at least 2.5. However, I believe the one with the funky rack is a little older. He maybe 3.5 but not much more. His head (not his rack)just makes me think he is a tad older.

 

[pledbetter]

Just looking at the bodies, all I could really be sure of they are both at least 2.5. However, I believe the one with the funky rack is a little older. He maybe 3.5 but not much more. His head (not his rack)just makes me think he is a tad older.

I thought that too bowriter...he just looks older in the face to me , lol

 

[harley 2008]

2.5

 

[Coach]

Yep, what BW said...

 

[mountin whitetails]

I would go with 3.5 best of luck to you.

 

[huntfish4life]

3 maybeee but 2.5 for sure