Remington700":2u2u19gx said:Is it just me or is this map awful? I wish it showed a little more detail on exact locations.
If you're a GIS and Mapping person such as myself, I can agree with you. But for the time being, it's better than nothing.Remington700":10iiid68 said:Is it just me or is this map awful? I wish it showed a little more detail on exact locations.
Andy S.":1wbk88wn said:If you're a GIS and Mapping person such as myself, I can agree with you. But for the time being, it's better than nothing.Remington700":1wbk88wn said:Is it just me or is this map awful? I wish it showed a little more detail on exact locations.
JJ3":2ckoalw1 said:Andy S.":2ckoalw1 said:If you're a GIS and Mapping person such as myself, I can agree with you. But for the time being, it's better than nothing.Remington700":2ckoalw1 said:Is it just me or is this map awful? I wish it showed a little more detail on exact locations.
Totally agree — it's the best we got and I think it is good the state is putting it out there.
Mississippi is including a year to date sampling map on their site. It looks like there have been about 150 samples from the 3 bordering counties that are in the 10 mile radious circles.
https://www.mdwfp.com/wildlife-hunting/ ... e/cwd-map/
Sampling for sure. With that said, if one would just zoom that map in about 5-10x, and print/export it, with major roads and intersections identifiable, it would be light years better than it is. Total additional effort would be 1-2 minutes tops.MickThompson":27q66nc6 said:Would y'all rather them have a slick website or be sampling a bunch of deer right now?