ShamrockIV
Well-Known Member
7.62x54r any thoughts? experiences? thanks!
Tiny said:they were junk.
Plain Old Dave said:Tiny said:they were junk.
Wow. Why don't you tell us how you really feel?
That said, military surplus rifles are every bit as accurate as sporting arms (and more so in some cases), more reliable, and in many cases more finely finished. I have been collecting for over 25 years and honestly have never understood why so many people look down their noses at antique/C&R military guns. For my part, I won't have a 70/77/700 in my safe. My military rifles are a lot more affordable, have more character, and are every bit as accurate; my Krag is a 1.5-2MOA rifle with factory ammo and iron sights.
Thats why I have two styles of guns. My hunting guns, made for hunting and my Mil-surp collection. I am in the process of building a 30/06 sporter out of a Czech 98 Mauser. Dont forget most modern hunting rifles are based off of the 98 Mauser.Longhunter said:The problem I find with most surplus rifles is that they are not designed for hunting. They are clumsy in the woods unless they have been sporterized. In their original form the are only a stand hunting rifle. There are exceptions. The Enfield Jungle Carbine and the Springfield 1903 are adequate for stillhunting. However if you compare them to a good levergun for this purpose they are still clumsy.
Surplus rifles are good, inexpensive, and accurate rifles that are fun to shoot. I have a few myself. However, they rarely see woods time for they are awkward to tote anywhere but to and from a stand.
Plain Old Dave said:Tiny said:they were junk.
Wow. Why don't you tell us how you really feel?
That said, military surplus rifles are every bit as accurate as sporting arms (and more so in some cases), more reliable, and in many cases more finely finished. I have been collecting for over 25 years and honestly have never understood why so many people look down their noses at antique/C&R military guns. For my part, I won't have a 70/77/700 in my safe. My military rifles are a lot more affordable, have more character, and are every bit as accurate; my Krag is a 1.5-2MOA rifle with factory ammo and iron sights.
Tiny said:Plain Old Dave said:Tiny said:they were junk.
Wow. Why don't you tell us how you really feel?
That said, military surplus rifles are every bit as accurate as sporting arms (and more so in some cases), more reliable, and in many cases more finely finished. I have been collecting for over 25 years and honestly have never understood why so many people look down their noses at antique/C&R military guns. For my part, I won't have a 70/77/700 in my safe. My military rifles are a lot more affordable, have more character, and are every bit as accurate; my Krag is a 1.5-2MOA rifle with factory ammo and iron sights.
Didn't Say they ALL were junk just those few I've seen being shot.
Plain Old Dave said:As I said when I joined Tndeer, I am a shooter and collector that hunts occasionally. I prefer military rifles over almost any sporting one; they might be heavier to carry but the weight soaks up recoil and the long barrels hang better for offhand shooting. There's still the money issue; why spend $500+ on a 70/77/700 when an $100 Mosin will shoot JUST as good and kill a deer JUST as dead? AND you have the bonus of the history behind the fine old military gun, too.
southernhunter said:would love to see a pic ?
DCloudy777 said:The 7.62X54R is also the oldest cartridge still in front-line military service. Just a bit of trivia.
DanO
DCloudy777 said:The 7.62X54R is also the oldest cartridge still in front-line military service. Just a bit of trivia.
DanO