bowriter said:
Just my opinion:
You stats from almost any TX study cannot be generally used in the real world. It is simply a different situation. In addition, I can think of no blanket statement you can make a mature buck or for that matter, any mature deer. Just as it is with humans, different animals just act differently. In conclusion, I put very credence to almost anything in a magazine or on TV.
In the past, almost all GPS and radio-collar studies were conducted in Texas. However, in the last 5-10 years, more and more of these studies have been conducted all over the Eastern U.S. And it's amazing how different the results are from one study area to another. What these studies clearly show are 1) how adaptive the white-tailed deer is to the local environment, developing highly specialized movement patterns most advantageous to just that location; and 2) how unique each individual animal is. In a recent GPS-collar study in the Midwest, some mature bucks had very small annual ranges (a few hundred acres), while other mature bucks had massive annual ranges (in excess of 14,000 acres). In fact, in this study the "average" range-size numbers were meaningless, as no buck actually had a range near the average.
In another study from the Deep South (Louisiana) a GPS-collared mature buck never left a 60-acre overgrown clear-cut for an entire year. THAT is a small annual range!