Plain Old Dave
Well-Known Member
I have been watching and participating in all the threads on this topic all year long, and really I think both the 2 buck and 3 buck people are approaching the problem from the wrong vantage point. Here in Unit B, we're seeing more and more urbanization and sprawl. This means less and less unspoiled deer habitat. And the comments on few mature bucks are many, at least for us here in Unit B; I have been chasing one for two years. Haven't seen him close enough to make a reliable shot with with the iron sighted rifles I have seemed to have in the woods every time I see him; front beads are fine for close in work, but not so much for 175-200 yards. Neither here nor there.
The Third Way, though, is a complete, sober, and reasoned review of doe quotas Statewide. I have seen a massive ONE buck I could conceivably had a shot at in the woods in both the 2014 and 2015 seasons, yet does bed in my yard here in Oak Ridge and I average 10-15 sightings a week HERE IN THE OAK RIDGE CITY LIMITS from roughly October-December. It seems obvious that the possibility that the does are eating the bucks out of house and home here in East Tennessee needs to be studied, and the simple solution is one that was discussed here last year:
Doe quotas based on multi-county habitat rather than county-by-county, and increase them for at least Morgan and Anderson and possibly Knox Counties, and concurrently begin a hunter education program to get the word out in East Tennessee that harvesting does is an important part of responsible game management.
The Third Way, though, is a complete, sober, and reasoned review of doe quotas Statewide. I have seen a massive ONE buck I could conceivably had a shot at in the woods in both the 2014 and 2015 seasons, yet does bed in my yard here in Oak Ridge and I average 10-15 sightings a week HERE IN THE OAK RIDGE CITY LIMITS from roughly October-December. It seems obvious that the possibility that the does are eating the bucks out of house and home here in East Tennessee needs to be studied, and the simple solution is one that was discussed here last year:
Doe quotas based on multi-county habitat rather than county-by-county, and increase them for at least Morgan and Anderson and possibly Knox Counties, and concurrently begin a hunter education program to get the word out in East Tennessee that harvesting does is an important part of responsible game management.