Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Fishing Forums
Fishing Forums
Why the reg change
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="David" data-source="post: 5592633" data-attributes="member: 5037"><p>Thanks for the info on that. Im not disagreeing with the science, but I do wonder why they would put the limit on some lakes but not others, I.E. like maples lake. Its a smaller body of water, but after fishing both, it seems like that would be the one to put the limit on since it doesn't seem to fish nearly as good as the others. Could be just my fishing though <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="David, post: 5592633, member: 5037"] Thanks for the info on that. Im not disagreeing with the science, but I do wonder why they would put the limit on some lakes but not others, I.E. like maples lake. Its a smaller body of water, but after fishing both, it seems like that would be the one to put the limit on since it doesn't seem to fish nearly as good as the others. Could be just my fishing though :) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Fishing Forums
Fishing Forums
Why the reg change
Top