Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Very interesting podcast episode
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AT Hiker" data-source="post: 5838523" data-attributes="member: 10019"><p>IMO, we should recruit Hunter supporters, not hunters. Hunters will come naturally, think holistic and grass roots. </p><p></p><p>Shane Mahoney makes a good argument for wild game consumption. Essentially he says that a few hunters can feed many people. </p><p></p><p>Think about it. The landscape cannot support the number of hunters it would take to make a difference in the financial or political realm. So let's assume 5% of the US population hunts, even if we doubled that or tripled it, we would never make the majority. So let's keep that number to a manageable level so our minority can enjoy the sport. Then, we recruit Hunter supporters, feed them delicious wild protein and assist them in managing a landscape that flourishes with wild things. </p><p></p><p>That's the kind of majority that we all benefit from.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AT Hiker, post: 5838523, member: 10019"] IMO, we should recruit Hunter supporters, not hunters. Hunters will come naturally, think holistic and grass roots. Shane Mahoney makes a good argument for wild game consumption. Essentially he says that a few hunters can feed many people. Think about it. The landscape cannot support the number of hunters it would take to make a difference in the financial or political realm. So let’s assume 5% of the US population hunts, even if we doubled that or tripled it, we would never make the majority. So let’s keep that number to a manageable level so our minority can enjoy the sport. Then, we recruit Hunter supporters, feed them delicious wild protein and assist them in managing a landscape that flourishes with wild things. That’s the kind of majority that we all benefit from. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Very interesting podcast episode
Top