Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Trophy rock vs Trophy Rock 465
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DoubleRidge" data-source="post: 5379273" data-attributes="member: 20594"><p>I've used both....both work....but the smaller pieces of rock (Four65) do melt quicker and the larger rocks last longer....but even when the smaller pieces melt they will still dig at and use the mineral site....but I like the larger rock better just because I can see it making it easier to decide when to replenish.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DoubleRidge, post: 5379273, member: 20594"] I've used both....both work....but the smaller pieces of rock (Four65) do melt quicker and the larger rocks last longer....but even when the smaller pieces melt they will still dig at and use the mineral site....but I like the larger rock better just because I can see it making it easier to decide when to replenish. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Trophy rock vs Trophy Rock 465
Top