Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Long Beards & Spurs
The NWR turkey hunts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="UpperTully" data-source="post: 4593712" data-attributes="member: 1983"><p>I imagine that's very possible and I've wondered the same thing. </p><p></p><p>They tossed this rule together at the last moment during the 2015 Winter flood, I personally don't think it was very well thought out. For example- all of Lake Co and parts of Weakley Co is in the emergency closure zone but protected by levee. Yea those areas hold slash water in places but dont deal with 8ft deep of water and current.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="UpperTully, post: 4593712, member: 1983"] I imagine that's very possible and I've wondered the same thing. They tossed this rule together at the last moment during the 2015 Winter flood, I personally don't think it was very well thought out. For example- all of Lake Co and parts of Weakley Co is in the emergency closure zone but protected by levee. Yea those areas hold slash water in places but dont deal with 8ft deep of water and current. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Long Beards & Spurs
The NWR turkey hunts
Top