Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Public land hunting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheLBLman" data-source="post: 5141848" data-attributes="member: 1409"><p>The Mississippian has this figure out! <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😃" title="Grinning face with big eyes :smiley:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f603.png" data-shortname=":smiley:" /></p><p></p><p>When I have more time, will elaborate more.</p><p>On <em>SOME</em> public lands, I've found almost the exact opposite to be true from the study cited.</p><p>In other words, so many people seek out those most "remote" locations, that much more easily accessed locations, closer to roads, actually become the little-hunted older deer sanctuaries.</p><p></p><p>Also, much public land acreage is less hunted than much private land acreage,</p><p>and I've found this to particularly be the case when comparing many public lands to many over-priced hunting leases.</p><p></p><p>I'm making no case for either public or private lands in terms of one offering more opportunity than the other. There are some big differences, but those differences may be less about opportunities and more about hunter preferences (such as hunting from a permanent enclosed tower on private property vs. packing a climbing stand into public property).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheLBLman, post: 5141848, member: 1409"] The Mississippian has this figure out! 😃 When I have more time, will elaborate more. On [I]SOME[/I] public lands, I've found almost the exact opposite to be true from the study cited. In other words, so many people seek out those most "remote" locations, that much more easily accessed locations, closer to roads, actually become the little-hunted older deer sanctuaries. Also, much public land acreage is less hunted than much private land acreage, and I've found this to particularly be the case when comparing many public lands to many over-priced hunting leases. I'm making no case for either public or private lands in terms of one offering more opportunity than the other. There are some big differences, but those differences may be less about opportunities and more about hunter preferences (such as hunting from a permanent enclosed tower on private property vs. packing a climbing stand into public property). [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Public land hunting
Top