Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Potential problems with field-judging age
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BSK" data-source="post: 5778540" data-attributes="member: 17"><p>I have seen a scenario once where a property/region experienced a "missing cohort." It was in the coastal region of SC, and the area experienced a severe tropical depression that flooded the region right at peak fawning time. We speculate many newborn fawns drown. We watched as that missing cohort progressed through the population for years. One year, an abnormally low number of years. The next year, an abnomrally low number of 2 1/2s. The following year, an abnormally low number of 3 1/2, etc.</p><p></p><p>But for this problem in particular, I went back and looked at previous years' data and could not find an "odd cohort" moving up the age pyramid that would explain this anomaly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BSK, post: 5778540, member: 17"] I have seen a scenario once where a property/region experienced a "missing cohort." It was in the coastal region of SC, and the area experienced a severe tropical depression that flooded the region right at peak fawning time. We speculate many newborn fawns drown. We watched as that missing cohort progressed through the population for years. One year, an abnormally low number of years. The next year, an abnomrally low number of 2 1/2s. The following year, an abnormally low number of 3 1/2, etc. But for this problem in particular, I went back and looked at previous years' data and could not find an "odd cohort" moving up the age pyramid that would explain this anomaly. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Potential problems with field-judging age
Top