Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Quality Deer Management
Odd trail-camera data
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BSK" data-source="post: 5588263" data-attributes="member: 17"><p>Just throwing this out there for all those who run camera censuses on their property: has anyone else observed rapidly increasing adult sex ratio data from cameras over food plots but NOT at other locations? I ask because I've noticed that with each passing year, I'm getting many, many more pictures of does feeding in food plots but not bucks. I may get 50 set of pictures of the same 3 does and 2 fawns feeding in a plot over an hour's time, but when a buck comes by I just get one or two sets of pictures as he feeds across the plot. The bucks almost never stay and feed for long periods of time. This doe-heavy feeding in food plots really skews my sex ratio data. In fact, I've gone to calculating my sex ratio data separating food plot data from all other camera locations. The food plot data shows a sky-rocketing number of does per buck while all other camera locations combined do not show this trend. I have no idea which number is "real" (and possibly neither are). Anyone else seen anything like this? Below is a graph (a three-year running mean) of calculated adult sex ratios for food plot cameras versus cameras not pointed into food plots since 2007. Notice how fast the adult sex ratio is skewing towards does in the food plot data but not for all other locations.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BSK, post: 5588263, member: 17"] Just throwing this out there for all those who run camera censuses on their property: has anyone else observed rapidly increasing adult sex ratio data from cameras over food plots but NOT at other locations? I ask because I've noticed that with each passing year, I'm getting many, many more pictures of does feeding in food plots but not bucks. I may get 50 set of pictures of the same 3 does and 2 fawns feeding in a plot over an hour's time, but when a buck comes by I just get one or two sets of pictures as he feeds across the plot. The bucks almost never stay and feed for long periods of time. This doe-heavy feeding in food plots really skews my sex ratio data. In fact, I've gone to calculating my sex ratio data separating food plot data from all other camera locations. The food plot data shows a sky-rocketing number of does per buck while all other camera locations combined do not show this trend. I have no idea which number is "real" (and possibly neither are). Anyone else seen anything like this? Below is a graph (a three-year running mean) of calculated adult sex ratios for food plot cameras versus cameras not pointed into food plots since 2007. Notice how fast the adult sex ratio is skewing towards does in the food plot data but not for all other locations. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Quality Deer Management
Odd trail-camera data
Top