Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Long Beards & Spurs
MS opens tomorrow right?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spurhunter" data-source="post: 5585941" data-attributes="member: 5695"><p>I get all that, but you didn't answer my question. How can a <em>state</em> tell non-residents that they can't hunt <em>federal</em> land that everybody pays for? I get that they can do whatever they want on <em>state</em> owned WMAs, but I'm talking about <em>federal</em> land. I don't really have a dog in the fight. I have numerous private tracts in MS I can hunt and I don't hunt public land anyway, but I just don't see the logic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spurhunter, post: 5585941, member: 5695"] I get all that, but you didn't answer my question. How can a [I]state[/I] tell non-residents that they can't hunt [I]federal[/I] land that everybody pays for? I get that they can do whatever they want on [I]state[/I] owned WMAs, but I'm talking about [I]federal[/I] land. I don't really have a dog in the fight. I have numerous private tracts in MS I can hunt and I don't hunt public land anyway, but I just don't see the logic. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Long Beards & Spurs
MS opens tomorrow right?
Top