Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Trail Cams & Pic's
Moultrie AC-42i Mini Cam Reviews?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheLBLman" data-source="post: 5704170" data-attributes="member: 1409"><p>I obtained two of these last year for testing.</p><p>I had been overall reasonably pleased with some of Moultrie's other non-cell models.</p><p>Not pleased with the AC-42i (considering its price point).</p><p>It might be a fair trade with a $19.95 price point.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Totally agree.</p><p>The appeal was the small size.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Overall, I have been disappointed, and will not be adding any more of them.</p><p>I've found battery life to be shorter than expected (even considering only 4 batteries).</p><p></p><p>Image quality is the absolute worse of any the many brands/models I'm running.</p><p>What's worse, these cams can quickly fill a 32gb card when set on 42 mp.</p><p>And never mind that those 42 mp are more in line with the 1.3 mp of an old Cuddeback.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Any other cam I have takes better pics, even when "set" on a 4 to 8mp (or "low to medium") image quality setting.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>BSK nailed it.</p><p>However, these images appear to be interpolated from maybe a 1.3mp original.</p><p>They are just way sub-par in today's trail cam market.</p><p>And again, many of Moultrie's other cams' imagery has been above par.</p><p></p><p>To add insult to injury, my biggest single complaint for these tiny cams is their <u>non-intuitive programming</u>, and <u>lack of programming options</u>. <u>Flash range is also very short</u>, making these cams virtually of no value at night on a food plot or field (can be ok on a salt lick or scrape).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheLBLman, post: 5704170, member: 1409"] I obtained two of these last year for testing. I had been overall reasonably pleased with some of Moultrie's other non-cell models. Not pleased with the AC-42i (considering its price point). It might be a fair trade with a $19.95 price point. Totally agree. The appeal was the small size. Overall, I have been disappointed, and will not be adding any more of them. I've found battery life to be shorter than expected (even considering only 4 batteries). Image quality is the absolute worse of any the many brands/models I'm running. What's worse, these cams can quickly fill a 32gb card when set on 42 mp. And never mind that those 42 mp are more in line with the 1.3 mp of an old Cuddeback. Any other cam I have takes better pics, even when "set" on a 4 to 8mp (or "low to medium") image quality setting. BSK nailed it. However, these images appear to be interpolated from maybe a 1.3mp original. They are just way sub-par in today's trail cam market. And again, many of Moultrie's other cams' imagery has been above par. To add insult to injury, my biggest single complaint for these tiny cams is their [U]non-intuitive programming[/U], and [U]lack of programming options[/U]. [U]Flash range is also very short[/U], making these cams virtually of no value at night on a food plot or field (can be ok on a salt lick or scrape). [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Trail Cams & Pic's
Moultrie AC-42i Mini Cam Reviews?
Top