Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Looking for someone to age a deer in Henderson County
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BSK" data-source="post: 5519822" data-attributes="member: 17"><p>Take a look at WHO touts cementum annuli. Those associated with the business. Look at who gives accurate analysis of the method. The best field research biologists going. Now if you're looking at deer from the North or Midwest, I would feel very confident with cementum annuli. But in the South and Southeast, lower accuracy than toothwear. Plus, the errors in cementum annuli run both ways - too young and too old. Toothwear rarely ages deer too old.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I want to see ALL the information. I want to see multiple pictures of that buck, from various angles, as close to the rut as possible (for field judging). I want to see toothwear. I want to see cementum annuli. But even with all that data, is the age accurate? Maybe. No method is perfectly accurate. But I'll go with either the average of those methods, or the closest two out of three.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BSK, post: 5519822, member: 17"] Take a look at WHO touts cementum annuli. Those associated with the business. Look at who gives accurate analysis of the method. The best field research biologists going. Now if you're looking at deer from the North or Midwest, I would feel very confident with cementum annuli. But in the South and Southeast, lower accuracy than toothwear. Plus, the errors in cementum annuli run both ways - too young and too old. Toothwear rarely ages deer too old. Personally, I want to see ALL the information. I want to see multiple pictures of that buck, from various angles, as close to the rut as possible (for field judging). I want to see toothwear. I want to see cementum annuli. But even with all that data, is the age accurate? Maybe. No method is perfectly accurate. But I'll go with either the average of those methods, or the closest two out of three. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Looking for someone to age a deer in Henderson County
Top